Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dianel555/DSkills --skill cc-agygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dianel555/DSkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dianel555/dskills/cc-agy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dianel555/dskills/cc-agy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dianel555/dskills/cc-agy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dianel555/dskills/cc-agy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dianel555/dskills/cc-agy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Rogue Agent · line 60 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 99 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00187 | $0.01619 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00093 | $0.00809 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00324 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00162 |
Grade A, and why
cc-agy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Quick Start
python scripts/agy_bridge.py --cd "/path/to/project" --PROMPT "Your task"
Output: JSON with success, SESSION_ID, agent_messages, steps_file, and optional error / note / stderr. On failure, error names the upstream cause agy recorded (e.g. a 400/503 status) when one exists.
Parameters
usage: agy_bridge.py [-h] --PROMPT PROMPT --cd CD
[--model MODEL] [--SESSION_ID SESSION_ID]
[--sandbox] [--no-skip-permissions]
[--print-timeout PRINT_TIMEOUT]
[--return-all-messages]
{check,plugin} ...
Antigravity (agy) Bridge
options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
--PROMPT PROMPT Instruction for the task to send to agy.
--cd CD Workspace root for agy (sets cwd + --add-dir).
--model MODEL Model alias (flash-low/medium/high, pro-low/high, sonnet,
opus, gpt-oss) or canonical string. Omit to use the
settings.json default.
--SESSION_ID SESSION_ID
Resume a conversation by UUID. Maps to agy --conversation.
--sandbox Run in agy sandbox mode.
--no-skip-permissions
Do NOT pass --dangerously-skip-permissions. WARNING:
with default toolPermission=request-review, print mode
WILL HANG. Only for interactive review workflows.
--print-timeout PRINT_TIMEOUT
agy --print-timeout (e.g. 5m, 10m). Default 10m.
--return-all-messages
Include reasoning + all type=15 steps in the response.
subcommands:
check Probe agy install / version / auth / current model.
plugin Thin passthrough to `agy plugin list|import|install|enable|disable`.
Multi-turn Sessions
Always capture SESSION_ID from the first response for follow-up (maps to agy --conversation <UUID>, which appends to the same conversation DB):
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 106 lines · 187 tokens per session scan A 6bc4529aac1d
cc-agy is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dianel555/DSkills (64 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 187 tokens to every session and 1,619 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
geekx-gate
A review framework for deciding whether an engineering idea or technical commitment is necessary, too broad, or premature. It examines the real problem, complexity, evidence, non-goals, and ease of reversal.
geekx-engineering
A set of engineering instructions for making substantial changes in an existing codebase. It emphasizes understanding the affected system, keeping a persistent plan, and recording decisions and evidence.
casely
Virtual QA Lead that turns requirement documents into review-ready, TestRail-importable test cases in one conversation — no commands to memorize. Use this skill whenever the user has requirements, a spec, a user story, or acceptance criteria (PDF, DOCX, XLSX, TXT, MD, or pasted text) and wants test cases, a test plan…
geekx-grilling
A questioning workflow for pressure-testing plans, decisions, requirements, and proposed solutions. It asks one important question at a time and uses the answers to clarify facts, choices, dependencies, scope, and exclusions.
battle-tested-engineer
Engineering judgment for code write/refactor/test and frontend UI. Trigger on code review, legacy cleanup, tests, UI with data, bloat/over-engineer complaints — even with no explicit mention, before any diff/rewrite/test suite. Output ultra-terse caveman style; code, commits, PR desc, security warnings stay normal…
tryworld-paper
A workflow for turning a Chinese voiceover script and optional images into a branded 16:9 AI-knowledge video in the “Paper Algorithm” style.