Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add digipulse-engineering/GAAI-framework --skill qa-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/digipulse-engineering/GAAI-frameworkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/digipulse-engineering/gaai-framework/qa-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/digipulse-engineering/gaai-framework/qa-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/digipulse-engineering/gaai-framework/qa-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/digipulse-engineering/gaai-framework/qa-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/digipulse-engineering/gaai-framework/qa-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.03184 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01274 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00637 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00318 |
Grade A, and why
qa-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago Changed · +25 lines 05d900ffaed0
- 1mo ago First seen · 217 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A cd0a48fc3e2f
qa-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository digipulse-engineering/GAAI-framework (163 stars, last pushed 6d ago), with no licence file. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 3,184 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
ownership
Write a knowledge file for each GitHub team that CODEOWNERS names as the owner of a root, with an OWNS claim to each file of that root. Script only; no model.
code-reviewer
Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, and Kotlin. Analyzes PRs for complexity, risk, SOLID violations, and code smells. Use when reviewing PRs, analyzing code quality, or generating review checklists.
pr-review-expert
Systematic PR review with blast-radius analysis, security scanning, and breaking-change and test-coverage deltas. Use when reviewing PRs that touch shared libraries, APIs, database schemas, auth, or security-sensitive code.
api-design-reviewer
Review REST API designs for quality, consistency, and breaking changes. Lints OpenAPI specs, generates scorecards, and detects breaking changes between versions. Use when designing APIs, reviewing contracts, or managing API versioning.
bcc-plan-spar
BCC align+lock+review PLAN.md for one slice (no product code). Slash: /bcc-plan-spar · chat: bcc:plan-spar · "lock PLAN" · spar the plan. Args: rounds=N (auto-review cap), review=self|subagent|cli|auto|off. Grill until clear enough (no default Q&A quota). Hand off to bcc-clean-cut after human APPROVE.
bcc-throughline
BCC global progress cockpit (plans.md/progress.md/findings.md). Slash: /bcc-throughline · chat: bcc:throughline · "where are we" · reprioritize · resume after /clear. Not for coding or full PLAN grill.