Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to diillson/chatcli. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/diillson/chatcli/main/.agent/skills/clean-code/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/diillson/chatcliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/clean-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/clean-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/diillson/chatcli/clean-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/diillson/chatcli/clean-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/diillson/chatcli/clean-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 199 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.01678 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00671 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00336 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00168 |
Grade A, and why
clean-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- clean-code — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- clean-code — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- clean-code — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 202 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Clean Code - Pragmatic AI Coding Standards
CRITICAL SKILL - Be concise, direct, and solution-focused.
Core Principles
| Principle | Rule |
|---|---|
| SRP | Single Responsibility - each function/class does ONE thing |
| DRY | Don't Repeat Yourself - extract duplicates, reuse |
| KISS | Keep It Simple - simplest solution that works |
| YAGNI | You Aren't Gonna Need It - don't build unused features |
| Boy Scout | Leave code cleaner than you found it |
Naming Rules
| Element | Convention |
|---|---|
| Variables | Reveal intent: userCount not n |
| Functions | Verb + noun: getUserById() not user() |
| Booleans | Question form: isActive, hasPermission, canEdit |
| Constants | SCREAMING_SNAKE: MAX_RETRY_COUNT |
Rule: If you need a comment to explain a name, rename it.
Function Rules
| Rule | Description |
|---|---|
| Small | Max 20 lines, ideally 5-10 |
| One Thing | Does one thing, does it well |
| One Level | One level of abstraction per function |
| Few Args | Max 3 arguments, prefer 0-2 |
| No Side Effects | Don't mutate inputs unexpectedly |
Code Structure
| Pattern | Apply |
|---|---|
| Guard Clauses | Early returns for edge cases |
| Flat > Nested | Avoid deep nesting (max 2 levels) |
| Composition | Small functions composed together |
| Colocation | Keep related code close |
AI Coding Style
| Situation | Action |
|---|---|
| User asks for feature | Write it directly |
| User reports bug | Fix it, don't explain |
| No clear requirement | Ask, don't assume |
Anti-Patterns (DON'T)
| ❌ Pattern | ✅ Fix |
|---|---|
| Comment every line | Delete obvious comments |
| Helper for one-liner | Inline the code |
| Factory for 2 objects | Direct instantiation |
| utils.ts with 1 function | Put code where used |
| "First we import..." | Just write code |
| Deep nesting | Guard clauses |
| Magic numbers | Named constants |
| God functions | Split by responsibility |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 202 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A ac3bae08f75a
clean-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository diillson/chatcli (93 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 1,678 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-state-bar
A design guide for an agent status bar: a short, automatically updated summary of progress, remaining tasks, tool counts, errors, and system state placed near the latest model input.
context-engineering
A guide to organizing the instructions and information an AI agent receives at each step. It covers system prompts, tool descriptions, conversation history, on-demand skills, and protections against unsafe outside content.
kv-cache-design
A guide to arranging an AI agent's conversation so previously processed text can be reused. A KV cache stores intermediate results for earlier tokens, while a prompt cache reuses a stable beginning across requests.
loop-engineering
A guide to building reliable loops for AI agents that plan, act, check their work, and continue until a task is truly complete. It includes independent verification and a proposer-reviewer pattern in which one agent's work is checked using outside evidence.
reward-design
A guide to defining the scores that an AI agent receives during trial-and-error training. It covers checks based on rules, human preferences, or another model, and distinguishes rewarding the final result from rewarding the steps taken.
pptx
A guide for turning a paper, outline, or structured text into a PowerPoint presentation. It covers an 8–12-slide structure, concise slide points, and generation of a .pptx file.