Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dirien/yet-another-agent-harness. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness/main/.claude/skills/go-nolint-audit/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dirien/yet-another-agent-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness/go-nolint-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness/go-nolint-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness/go-nolint-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness/go-nolint-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dirien/yet-another-agent-harness/go-nolint-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01387 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00694 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00277 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00139 |
Grade A, and why
go-nolint-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Go Nolint Audit
Audit //nolint: directives in Go codebases. Finds suppressions that
are stale (code changed, lint rule no longer triggers) or lazily
justified (the underlying code could be fixed instead of suppressed).
Challenges each justification through adversarial debate rather than
accepting comments at face value.
Prerequisite check
go version 2>/dev/null && golangci-lint --version 2>/dev/null
If go is not installed, stop and report. If golangci-lint is
missing:
- Install from https://golangci-lint.run/welcome/install/
Do not proceed without both tools available.
Discover nolint directives
grep -rn '//nolint' --include='*.go' . | grep -v vendor/
Match all variants: //nolint (bare), //nolint:rule,
//nolint:rule1,rule2. For each directive, capture:
- File and line number
- Suppressed rule(s), or "bare" if no rule specified
- Justification comment (text after
//nolint:rule //if present) - Surrounding code context (~5 lines)
Bare //nolint (no rule) suppresses everything — flag for Phase 2
automatically. If zero directives found, report a clean codebase
and stop.
Phase 1: Mechanical verification
For each directive with a named rule, test whether the suppression
is still needed. Co-enable nolintlint alongside the target rule:
# v2 syntax (preferred):
golangci-lint run --enable-only=<rule>,nolintlint \
--allow-parallel-runners <file>
# v1 syntax (if v2 unavailable):
golangci-lint run --disable-all --enable=<rule>,nolintlint \
--allow-parallel-runners <file>
If nolintlint reports the directive as unused, it is stale. This
avoids modifying source files. For multi-rule directives
(//nolint:rule1,rule2), test each rule separately. Run up to 3
parallel shell commands. Always use --allow-parallel-runners.
If golangci-lint fails for reasons other than the target rule (build errors, missing deps), skip the directive and report as "unable to verify."
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 165 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 342edf4466da
go-nolint-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository dirien/yet-another-agent-harness (20 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,387 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…