Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/main/.claude/skills/review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00311 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
Review all uncommitted changes against project standards.
Steps
1. Gather Changes
git diff
git diff --cached
git status --short
2. Review Criteria
For each changed file, check:
Architecture
- Follows Vertical Slice Architecture (no cross-slice imports except via
src/lib/) - No
/services,/utils,/controllersdirectories created - Feature code in the correct slice
TypeScript
- No
anytypes (useunknown+ type guards) - Proper error handling with typed errors
- Zod schemas for external data validation
React
- Components use named exports
- Server vs client boundary is correct
- No unnecessary
useEffectfor data fetching (use TanStack Query)
Security
- No secrets in code
- No path traversal in filesystem reads (all reads scoped to
~/.claude) - Server function return values validated with Zod
3. Report
Output a structured review:
## Review Summary
- Files reviewed: N
- Issues found: N (critical: N, warning: N, info: N)
## Issues
### [CRITICAL/WARNING/INFO] filename:line — description
4. Suggest Fixes
For each critical or warning issue, provide a specific fix suggestion.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 59 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A bde3f8c5e083
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard (67 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 311 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
shipkit-review-shipping
Review changes across 12 quality dimensions and report findings. Use after a chunk of work or before commit.
shipkit-prompt-audit
Audit LLM prompt pipeline architecture — decomposition, parallelization, chain integrity, schema validation, fallback paths. Finds structural issues no linter catches.
shipkit-review-planning
Internal reviewer — assesses planning artifact alignment. Checks definitions agree, specs cover roadmap, no gaps. A per-unit reviewer invoked by a caller (the engine in steered mode or a direction/planning caller), not for direct use.
shipkit-review-direction
Internal reviewer — assesses strategic artifact coherence. Checks vision/why alignment, goal completeness, stage realism. The Direction coherence-review gate, dispatched by the engine (via shipkit-direction), not for direct use.
session-review
End-of-session adversarial review loop. Assemble the session's work into a role-assigned, self-contained brief, then run independent reviewers in parallel — an isolated code-reader (the idea-validator agent) that reads the ACTUAL files and web-checks technology currency, plus an external-family model if you have one …
peer-review
Use when Claude completes a spec or code implementation and needs independent review, or when the user invokes /peer-review. Triggers automatically after spec writing or code completion for production projects. Only bypass when user explicitly opts out.