Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/main/.claude/skills/review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboardWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00311 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
Review all uncommitted changes against project standards.
Steps
1. Gather Changes
git diff
git diff --cached
git status --short
2. Review Criteria
For each changed file, check:
Architecture
- Follows Vertical Slice Architecture (no cross-slice imports except via
src/lib/) - No
/services,/utils,/controllersdirectories created - Feature code in the correct slice
TypeScript
- No
anytypes (useunknown+ type guards) - Proper error handling with typed errors
- Zod schemas for external data validation
React
- Components use named exports
- Server vs client boundary is correct
- No unnecessary
useEffectfor data fetching (use TanStack Query)
Security
- No secrets in code
- No path traversal in filesystem reads (all reads scoped to
~/.claude) - Server function return values validated with Zod
3. Report
Output a structured review:
## Review Summary
- Files reviewed: N
- Issues found: N (critical: N, warning: N, info: N)
## Issues
### [CRITICAL/WARNING/INFO] filename:line — description
4. Suggest Fixes
For each critical or warning issue, provide a specific fix suggestion.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A bde3f8c5e083
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository dlupiak/claude-session-dashboard (76 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 311 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-01.
Other skills, from other repositories
generic-react-code-reviewer
Review React/TypeScript code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, GPU-accelerated animations, WCAG AA accessibility, bundle size limits, and surgical simplicity. Use when completing features, before commits, or…
generic-fullstack-code-reviewer
Review full-stack code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, input validation, GPU-accelerated animations, and design system consistency. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
generic-static-code-reviewer
Review static site code for bugs, security issues, performance problems, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces pure HTML/CSS/JS standards, minimal page weight, mobile-first design. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing changes.
ai-architect-review
Review the architecture of a system that calls a language model. Use when adding an agent loop, a retrieval path, a tool surface, or an MCP server to a codebase; when a system that worked in a demo is being prepared for production; or when asked to audit, review, or plan AI/agent architecture. Checks the four…
review
Code review with semantic diffs, expert routing, and auto-TaskCreate. Triggers on: code review, review changes, check code, review PR, security audit.
github-code-review
Comprehensive GitHub pull-request code review with multi-agent coordination. Use when reviewing a PR or diff, auditing changes for correctness/security/style before merge, or generating actionable inline review comments.