Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill generic-static-code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/travisjneuman/.claudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/generic-static-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/generic-static-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/generic-static-code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/generic-static-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/travisjneuman/.claude/generic-static-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 18 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00820 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00410 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00164 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00082 |
Grade A, and why
generic-static-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Static Site Code Reviewer
Review HTML/CSS/JS code against production quality standards.
Extends: Generic Code Reviewer - Read base skill for full code review methodology, P0/P1/P2 priority system, and judgment calls.
Pre-Commit Checklist
# Local testing (cross-platform options)
python -m http.server 8000 # Windows
python3 -m http.server 8000 # macOS/Linux
npx serve . # Node.js (recommended - all platforms)
# Visual inspection
# - Test in Chrome, Firefox, Safari
# - Test at 375px, 768px, 1024px
# - Lighthouse audit
- Visual inspection passed
- Works in all major browsers
- Responsive at all breakpoints
- Lighthouse Performance 95+
Static-Specific Checks
No Build Tools Verification
Files should be served as-is:
- Pure
.htmlfiles (no templating) - Pure
.cssfiles (no Sass/Less) - Pure
.jsfiles (no bundling/transpilation) - No
node_modulesrequired for production
Page Weight Targets (P1)
| Target | Max Size |
|---|---|
| HTML | < 5KB |
| CSS | < 10KB |
| JavaScript | < 5KB |
| Total (excl. images) | < 50KB |
| Images (each) | < 500KB |
HTML Quality
<!-- Semantic structure -->
<header>
<nav><a href="#">Link</a></nav>
</header>
<main>
<article>
<h1>Title</h1>
<p>Content</p>
</article>
</main>
<footer></footer>
<!-- Void elements (no closing slash needed in HTML5) -->
<img src="image.jpg" alt="Description" />
<br />
<input type="text" />
CSS Quality
/* CSS custom properties for theming */
:root {
--bg-primary: #000000;
--text-primary: #ffffff;
--accent: #00ff00;
}
/* Mobile-first responsive */
.container {
padding: 1rem;
}
@media (min-width: 768px) {
.container {
padding: 2rem;
}
}
/* Avoid !important - signals specificity problems */
JavaScript Quality
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 130 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 9bb44ed90aec
generic-static-code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository travisjneuman/.claude (97 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 820 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
frontend-code-review
Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., .tsx, .ts, .js). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.
page-template
Scaffold a sitemap-organized HTML showcase site (provenance reports, contractor showcases, telemetry dashboards, weekly digests, audit results).
static-page-stack
SOTA stack recommendations for elegant, controlled, semantic static HTML pages — dashboards, post-mortems, technical-investigation reports.
plan-review-architecture
Architecture-dimension reviewer for written plans. Use when running plan-review or directly when an architectural review is wanted. Activate for keywords like "architecture review", "data flow", "failure modes", "rollback", "edge cases", "test matrix". Scores 5 sub-dimensions 0-10, produces ranked fixes. Always cite…
frontend-design
Visual and UX design quality for interfaces: hierarchy, spacing rhythm, typographic scale, a restrained color system, layout composition, and polished states. The taste layer above frontend architecture and a11y.
design-system
DESIGN.md integration for Forge — ensures visual consistency across all UI tasks through standardized design specifications.