deps-upgrade

deps-upgrade is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from dmythro/agent-skills. It costs 134 tokens per session (6,623 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A skill for checking JavaScript and TypeScript dependency updates after package versions have been changed. It examines the actual differences and the changes required by each update.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for validating batches of upgrades, investigating a package that cannot move forward, reviewing release notes, and diagnosing new type, build, or test failures.
Why use it?
It helps find compatibility problems, breaking changes, migration work, and packages that were held back or may no longer be needed.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It is for validating batches of upgrades, investigating a package that cannot move forward, reviewing release notes, and diagnosing new type, build, or test failures.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/dmythro/agent-skills/deps-upgrade
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add dmythro/agent-skills --skill deps-upgrade
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dmythro/agent-skills

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for deps-upgrade

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dmythro/agent-skills/deps-upgrade/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dmythro/agent-skills/deps-upgrade)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dmythro/agent-skills/deps-upgrade"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dmythro/agent-skills/deps-upgrade/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for deps-upgrade

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dmythro/agent-skills/deps-upgrade"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dmythro/agent-skills/deps-upgrade.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 134 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 6,623 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 107
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 107
    npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.
    Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
  • medium Excessive Agency · line 248
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00134 $0.06623
Opus 5 $0.00067 $0.03312
Sonnet 5 $0.00027 $0.01325
Haiku 4.5 $0.00013 $0.00662

Measured 12d ago against content hash 5a4b32c0dbc7, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

deps-upgrade scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/deps-upgrade/SKILL.md · 329 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 329 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Dependency Upgrade Validation

The upgrade is the easy part; proving the project still coheres is the work. This skill takes over after versions are chosen -- typically bun update -i -r or an equivalent interactive pick -- and validates what landed: the real delta from git, peer and engine integrity, breaking changes and migrations across every version crossed, features worth adopting, and verification gates that run the project rather than reading about it. It also answers the inverse question: can a held-back package move, and why is it in package.json at all.

When to Use

  • Validating a batch upgrade -- "I upgraded a lot of packages, validate everything"
  • Assessing a held-back package -- "can we upgrade X?", "what blocks it?"
  • Questioning a dependency -- "why do we even have X, we don't use it"
  • Reading release notes -- breaking changes, migration steps, new features across the versions crossed
  • Post-upgrade triage -- type, build or test failures that appeared after an update
  • Pre-upgrade recon -- what a bump would cost before anyone runs it

Critical Rules

  1. Detect the manager first, then use only its column. A Bun project gets bun throughout, a pnpm project pnpm, an npm project npm, a yarn project yarn. Another manager's CLI may not be installed at all, and if it is, it resolves against its own rules and can write a second lockfile or a differently-shaped tree. Every capability this skill needs has a native form in all four managers -- see the Capability Matrix -- so there is never a reason to reach across.
  2. Establish the delta from git, never from the prompt. "I upgraded a lot of packages" is a starting point, not an inventory. The lockfile diff is the only complete record -- it carries transitive bumps that package.json never shows.
  3. outdated reports drift, not compatibility. A clean bun outdated means every dependency sits at the newest version its range allows; it says nothing about whether the tree still resolves, builds or runs. Never report an upgrade as validated on that basis.
  4. Peer ranges of ecosystem packages are the ceiling, not the registry's latest. A framework plugin pinning next@">=16.2.6 <17.0.0" caps the framework regardless of what the registry calls latest. Read the peers of the packages that wrap the target before proposing a bump.
  5. A peer-required package is required with zero imports. graphql is a mandatory peerDependency of [email protected]; an app that never writes a query still must declare it. Run bun why and check every installed peer before proposing any removal (see references/dependency-audit.md).
  6. Never run a migration, codemod, or version change without explicit approval. Report the exact command and what it will touch. Schema migrations additionally need an ordering and rollback story before they are worth proposing.
  7. Read notes for every version crossed, not just the target. A breaking change introduced in 16.9 and unmentioned in 16.14's notes is still a breaking change for a project coming from 16.8.
  8. Verify by running the project. Typecheck, build and tests are the evidence. A changelog that promises compatibility is not evidence.
  9. Report what you did not check. Skipped packages, unread notes and untested paths belong in the report; silence reads as coverage.

Read the full file on GitHub · 329 lines

Files

What ships with it

5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 329 lines · 134 tokens per session scan A 5a4b32c0dbc7

Subscribe to this mod's changes

deps-upgrade is a skill published in the GitHub repository dmythro/agent-skills (6 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 134 tokens to every session and 6,623 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.