Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DNYoussef/context-cascade --skill code-review-assistantgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DNYoussef/context-cascadeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dnyoussef/context-cascade/code-review-assistant)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dnyoussef/context-cascade/code-review-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dnyoussef/context-cascade/code-review-assistant/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dnyoussef/context-cascade/code-review-assistant"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dnyoussef/context-cascade/code-review-assistant.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01972 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00789 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00394 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00197 |
Grade A, and why
code-review-assistant scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/============================================================================/ /* CODE-REVIEW-ASSISTANT SKILL :: VERILINGUA x VERIX EDITION / /============================================================================*/
name: code-review-assistant version: 1.1.0 description: | [assert|neutral] Comprehensive PR review using multi-agent swarm with specialized reviewers for security, performance, style, tests, and documentation. Provides detailed feedback with auto-fix suggestions and merge re [ground:given] [conf:0.95] [state:confirmed] category: quality tags:
- review
- pr
- github
- swarm
- essential author: ruv cognitive_frame: primary: evidential goal_analysis: first_order: "Execute code-review-assistant workflow" second_order: "Ensure quality and consistency" third_order: "Enable systematic quality processes"
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S0 META-IDENTITY / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[define|neutral] SKILL := { name: "code-review-assistant", category: "quality", version: "1.1.0", layer: L1 } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S1 COGNITIVE FRAME / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[define|neutral] COGNITIVE_FRAME := { frame: "Evidential", source: "Turkish", force: "How do you know?" } [ground:cognitive-science] [conf:0.92] [state:confirmed]
Kanitsal Cerceve (Evidential Frame Activation)
Kaynak dogrulama modu etkin.
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S2 TRIGGER CONDITIONS / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
[define|neutral] TRIGGER_POSITIVE := { keywords: ["code-review-assistant", "quality", "workflow"], context: "user needs code-review-assistant capability" } [ground:given] [conf:1.0] [state:confirmed]
/----------------------------------------------------------------------------/ /* S3 CORE CONTENT / /----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
What ships with it
19 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/example-1-security-review.md 9.3 KB
- examples/example-2-performance-review.md 16 KB
- examples/example-3-style-review.md 19 KB
- graphviz/workflow.dot 6.9 KB
- manifest.json 1.0 KB
- readme.md 8.6 KB
- references/best-practices.md 17 KB
- references/index.md 9.8 KB
- references/review-categories.md 14 KB
- resources/scripts/multi_agent_review.py 21 KB runs code
- resources/scripts/performance_check.py 13 KB runs code
- resources/scripts/security_scan.sh 9.0 KB runs code
- resources/scripts/style_audit.py 15 KB runs code
- resources/templates/performance-thresholds.json 8.0 KB
- resources/templates/review-checklist.yaml 6.9 KB
- resources/templates/security-rules.json 9.8 KB
- tests/test-1-basic-review.md 5.7 KB
- tests/test-2-security-focus.md 8.0 KB
- tests/test-3-5agent-swarm.md 12 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 197 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A cc0b86a7eced
code-review-assistant is a skill published in the GitHub repository DNYoussef/context-cascade (32 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,972 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
asplos-writing-style
Use when drafting or revising ASPLOS prose — engineering the first two pages that rapid review actually reads, stating the cross-layer insight as one quotable sentence, structuring per-layer mechanism sections, writing bounded claims, and fitting everything into 11 self-contained pages that include figures and…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…