Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/docxology/template/pipeline-debuggingnpx skills add docxology/template --skill pipeline-debugginggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/docxology/templateWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00103 | $0.00937 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00051 | $0.00468 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00094 |
Grade A, and why
template-pipeline-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pipeline debugging
Natural invoke
- "My pipeline failed at PDF render for template_code_project"
- "Project Analysis finishes in under a second with no figures — help debug"
- "run.sh --pipeline failed; what's the first real error?"
- "Resume from checkpoint after fixing project tests"
Inputs to confirm
- Project — from
docs/_generated/active_projects.md; infer from context if obvious. - Invocation — full vs
--core-only,--resume,--skip-infra, multi-project. - Failing stage — if unknown, reproduce first.
Workflow
-
Reproduce — re-run the failing invocation verbatim; capture full stderr/stdout and exit status. Quote the first real error, not the last line. Name the failing stage (setup, infra tests, project tests, analysis, render, validate, LLM review, LLM translations, copy).
-
Isolate — run that stage's underlying command directly (pytest target, analysis script, validation CLI, renderer). Use
--resumeto skip good upstream stages while iterating. -
Classify — dependency/uv gap, missing system tool (LaTeX/pandoc-crossref), nondeterministic input, coverage gate, undefined citation/cross-ref, thin-orchestrator violation (logic in
scripts/notsrc/), or logic bug. When Project Analysis completes in under a second with no figures, treat as import/dependency failure and isolate viascripts/pipeline/stage_02_analysis.py. Trace where bad state enters; fix at ingestion. -
Fix minimally — re-run full pipeline green; confirm
--resumeshows no upstream regression. Updateprojects/<n>/AGENTS.md/README.mdif the failure mode was non-obvious.
Deliverables
- Failing stage, first real error (quoted), root cause, minimal patch (file + snippet).
- Exact commands + raw exit status proving green.
- Do not claim "fixed" without a clean full-pipeline run.
Verification commands
uv sync
uv run python scripts/runner/execute_pipeline.py --project <project>
uv run python scripts/runner/execute_pipeline.py --project <project> --resume
uv run python scripts/runner/execute_pipeline.py --project <project> --core-only
uv run python scripts/pipeline/stage_01_test.py --project <project>
uv run pytest projects/<project>/tests/ --cov=projects/<project>/src --cov-fail-under=90 -q
uv run python -m infrastructure.validation.cli prerender projects/<project>/manuscript --repo-root .
uv run python -m infrastructure.validation.cli pdf output/<project>/pdf/
uv run python -m infrastructure.rendering.latex_package_validator
LOG_LEVEL=0 uv run python scripts/runner/execute_pipeline.py --project <project> --resume
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 76 lines · 103 tokens per session scan A dd3a20f54dcc
template-pipeline-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository docxology/template (19 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 103 tokens to every session and 937 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
browser-trace
Capture a full DevTools-protocol trace of any browser automation — CDP firehose, screenshots, and DOM dumps — then bisect the stream into per-page searchable buckets. Use when the user wants to debug a failed run, audit network/console/DOM activity, attach a trace to an in-progress session, or feed structured per-page…
planning-with-files
Manus-style persistent file-based planning for AI coding agents: keeps taskplan.md, findings.md, and progress.md on disk so work survives context loss and /clear. Use when asked to plan out, break down, or organize a multi-step project, research task, or any work requiring 5+ tool calls. Supports automatic session…
ai-elements
Build AI chat interfaces using ai-elements components — conversations, messages, tool displays, prompt inputs, and more. Use when the user wants to build a chatbot, AI assistant UI, or any AI-powered chat interface.
exa-search
Use Exa MCP for current web, code/docs, company, people, and page-fetch research. Prefer current hosted tool schemas and note deprecated tools.
ontoly-software-graph
Use Ontoly's deterministic Software Graph and MCP capabilities for repository architecture, request tracing, dependency analysis, configuration lookup, and impact analysis before falling back to source search.
kimi-webbridge
Kimi WebBridge lets AI control the user's real browser — navigate, click, type, read, screenshot, and interact with any website using the user's actual login sessions. Use this skill whenever the user wants to interact with websites, automate browser tasks, scrape web content, or perform any action requiring a real…