Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dogacel/auto-gpu-kernel --skill log-experimentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dogacel/auto-gpu-kernelWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dogacel/auto-gpu-kernel/log-experiment)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dogacel/auto-gpu-kernel/log-experiment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dogacel/auto-gpu-kernel/log-experiment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dogacel/auto-gpu-kernel/log-experiment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dogacel/auto-gpu-kernel/log-experiment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00500 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00250 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
log-experiment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
log-experiment
Log the most recent experiment. Never skip — failures are as valuable as wins.
Pick folder
List experiments/exp_*/. Let N = highest number.
- If
exp_N/plan.mdexists withoutresult.md→ useexp_N/. - Else → create
exp_(N+1)/. - No folders yet →
exp_1/.
Never overwrite an existing result.md. If you'd have to, stop and ask the user.
Write artifacts
- Copy the kernel (the
entry_pointfile fromconfig.toml) into the folder, same filename. - Copy the benchmark log to
bench.login the folder. - Write
result.md:
# Experiment N — YYYY-MM-DD
**Description:** what changed, why. Reference `plan.md` when implementing one.
**Runner:** <backend> / <gpu> (from config.toml — results are only comparable within one backend)
## Results
- Pass: X/Y
- Kernel latency (ms): small=S.SSS / large=L.LLL / overall=O.OOO (min / mean / median / max)
- Reference latency (ms): R.RRR
- Max abs err: X.XXe-X | Max rel err: X.XXe-X
- Mode: quick | stride N | full (| ab-vs-exp_K if A/B)
## Learnings
What was learned. What to try or avoid next. If durable cross-experiment insight, also append one line to `experiments/LESSONS.md`.
- Append to
experiments/summary.md(create with header row if missing):
| Exp | Date | Description | Latency | Ref | Pass | Backend | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | YYYY-MM-DD | one phrase | O.OOO ms | R.RRR ms | X/Y | modal/B200 | Δ% vs prior best, "new best" / "regression" / "ablation" |
Keep Notes terse. Detail lives in result.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 51 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A d714e7dce189
log-experiment is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dogacel/auto-gpu-kernel (161 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 500 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-13.
Other skills, from other repositories
cuda-kernel-optimizer
Use when optimizing or diagnosing GPU workload performance with CUDA, CUTLASS, Triton, PyTorch, vLLM or TensorRT-LLM; interpreting NCU, Nsys or PyTorch Profiler evidence; or preparing the workload and correctness checks for such optimization. General coding, skill maintenance and conceptual GPU questions do not…
skypilot-multi-cloud-orchestration
Multi-cloud orchestration for ML workloads with automatic cost optimization. Use when you need to run training or batch jobs across multiple clouds, leverage spot instances with auto-recovery, or optimize GPU costs across providers.
analyzing-linux-kernel-rootkits
Detect kernel-level rootkits in Linux memory dumps using Volatility3 linux plugins (checksyscall, lsmod, hiddenmodules), rkhunter system scanning, and /proc vs /sys discrepancy analysis to identify hooked syscalls, hidden kernel modules, and tampered system structures.
colab-finetuning
Fine-tune LLMs on Google Colab GPUs directly from openscience. Connects to Colab runtimes via WebSocket bridge for remote training with Unsloth. Supports SFT, GRPO, DPO, vision, and TTS workflows on free T4 to Pro A100 GPUs.
modal-serverless-gpu
Run approved CPU or GPU work through OpenScience computejob on the user's configured Modal account. Use for isolated scientific scripts, dependency provisioning, durable outputs, logs, status, cancellation, and recovery. Never invoke the Modal SDK or CLI directly.
review
Structured PR review for pygraphistry. Input: PR number/branch (default current branch PR). Output: findings and convergence artifacts under plans/ /. Method: multi-wave, evidence-first review across spec, correctness, tests, security, code quality, DRY, concurrency, performance, architecture, operability, and…