Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/dispatching-parallel-agentsnpx skills add DollarDill/beads-superpowers --skill dispatching-parallel-agentsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DollarDill/beads-superpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/dispatching-parallel-agents)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/dispatching-parallel-agents"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/dispatching-parallel-agents.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.02352 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01176 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00470 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00235 |
Grade A, and why
dispatching-parallel-agents scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 232 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Dispatching Parallel Agents
Overview
You delegate tasks to specialized agents with isolated context. By precisely crafting their instructions and context, you ensure they stay focused and succeed at their task. They should never inherit your session's context or history — you construct exactly what they need. This also preserves your own context for coordination work.
When you have multiple independent tasks — whether bug investigations, plan tasks, or subsystem changes — executing them sequentially wastes time. Each task is independent and can happen in parallel, provided each agent gets its own isolated workspace.
Core principle: Dispatch one agent per independent problem domain. Let them work concurrently.
When to Use
digraph when_to_use {
"Multiple failures?" [shape=diamond];
"Are they independent?" [shape=diamond];
"Single agent investigates all" [shape=box];
"One agent per problem domain" [shape=box];
"Can they work in parallel?" [shape=diamond];
"Sequential agents" [shape=box];
"Parallel dispatch" [shape=box];
"Multiple failures?" -> "Are they independent?" [label="yes"];
"Are they independent?" -> "Single agent investigates all" [label="no - related"];
"Are they independent?" -> "Can they work in parallel?" [label="yes"];
"Can they work in parallel?" -> "Parallel dispatch" [label="yes"];
"Can they work in parallel?" -> "Sequential agents" [label="no - shared state"];
}
Use when:
- 3+ test files failing with different root causes
- Multiple subsystems broken independently
- Each problem can be understood without context from others
- No shared state between investigations
- 2+ independent plan tasks with no dependency edges between them
- Multiple independent subsystem changes (different files, different concerns)
Don't use when:
- Failures are related (fix one might fix others)
- Need to understand full system state
- Agents would interfere with each other
The Pattern
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 232 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 13f747137b53
dispatching-parallel-agents is a skill published in the GitHub repository DollarDill/beads-superpowers (26 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 2,352 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
beads-onboard
This skill should be used when the user asks to "onboard beads", "set up beads conventions", "configure beads for this project", "set up project labels", "improve my beads quality", "run beads onboard", "upgrade beads conventions", "re-run beads onboard", or when a project has .beads/ but no .beads/conventions/…
backend-launcher
Use when Compound V's dispatcher needs to run one file-scoped job on a chosen backend (Claude subagent, headless Codex worker, headless Antigravity worker, headless Cursor worker, or headless opencode worker) and get back a canonical jobresult. The single jobspec → jobresult contract every adapter implements; the…
compound-v
Use when superpowers:brainstorming is about to begin (pre-brainstorm recon), OR has produced a spec, OR when superpowers:writing-plans has produced a plan, OR when about to invoke superpowers:subagent-driven-development or superpowers:executing-plans. Sidekick that intercepts these four Superpowers transitions — runs…
pr-review
Use when the user wants to deeply review a pull/merge request or a local diff — "review this PR", "grill the MR", "stress-test this diff", "deep-dive code review", "code review before merge", or when they name a PR/MR URL, number, branch, commit range (A..B/A...B), tag or SHA. Works on GitHub (gh), GitLab (glab), or a…
linear-workspace
Linear issue management — routes work to specialized agents and slash commands. Use when: creating, updating, searching, bulk-editing, cleaning up, syncing Linear. TRIGGERS: "linear", "ticket", "issue", "create issue", "update issue", "search issues", "my issues", "bulk", "cleanup", "sync", "log bug", "file issue"…
brainstorming-codex
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation. Codex-backed variant.