Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DollarDill/beads-superpowers --skill finishing-a-development-branchgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DollarDill/beads-superpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/finishing-a-development-branch)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/finishing-a-development-branch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/finishing-a-development-branch/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/finishing-a-development-branch"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/finishing-a-development-branch.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 169 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 347 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
- medium Excessive Agency · line 356 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.03634 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.01454 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00727 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00363 |
Grade A, and why
finishing-a-development-branch scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 379 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Finishing a Development Branch
Overview
Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
The Process
Step 1: Verify Tests
Before presenting options, verify tests pass:
# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...
If tests fail:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.
Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.
If tests pass: Run pre-merge checklist:
# Check for duplicate beads (clean up before merge)
bd find-duplicates
If bd find-duplicates reports issues, fix them before proceeding. Then continue to Step 2.
A green suite is necessary but not sufficient: do not merge if a requirement was dropped or a security regression remains (Production-Grade Doctrine).
Step 2: Detect Environment
Run the following to determine the git context:
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
IS_WORKTREE=$( [ "$GIT_DIR" != "$GIT_COMMON" ] && echo "yes" || echo "no" )
IS_DETACHED=$( git symbolic-ref HEAD >/dev/null 2>&1 && echo "no" || echo "yes" )
# Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory
# before Step 6 needs this value
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
| Context | Detection | Menu |
|---|---|---|
| Normal repo | IS_WORKTREE=no, IS_DETACHED=no |
Full 3 options |
| Named-branch worktree | IS_WORKTREE=yes, IS_DETACHED=no |
Full 3 options |
| Detached HEAD | IS_DETACHED=yes |
Reduced 2 options (no "Merge locally") |
Step 3: Determine Base Branch
# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null
Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 379 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 1ea03b808843
finishing-a-development-branch is a skill published in the GitHub repository DollarDill/beads-superpowers (32 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 3,634 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
finishing-a-development-branch compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| finishing-a-development-branchDollarDill/beads-superpowers | Skill | 32 | 7d ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| beads-onboardseanmartinsmith/sms-public-mkt | Skill | 3 | 28d ago | MIT | A | 96 | Claude Code |
| finishing-a-development-branch-codexmzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex | Skill | 7 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code |
| using-git-worktrees-codexmzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex | Skill | 7 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| update-prReflexioAI/claude-smart | Skill | 791 | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 71 | Claude Code, Codex |
| glabNikiforovAll/claude-code-rules | Skill | 142 | 4d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 59 | Claude Code |
| commitsuxrobGM/jobpilot | Skill | 109 | yesterday | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |