Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/test-driven-developmentnpx skills add DollarDill/beads-superpowers --skill test-driven-developmentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DollarDill/beads-superpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/test-driven-development)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/test-driven-development"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dollardill/beads-superpowers/test-driven-development.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00017 | $0.02514 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.01257 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00503 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00251 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 343 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development (TDD)
Overview
Write the test first. Watch it fail. Write minimal code to pass.
Core principle: If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
Violating the letter of the rules is violating the spirit of the rules.
Spec-backed: implementation starts from an approved spec or plan. Before the first edit, state the file you are working from — Working from: <spec-or-plan path>. No such file yet? Say so and run brainstorming first. A plan task, a completed root-cause investigation, or a typo/comment/rename already satisfies this.
When to Use
Always:
- New features
- Bug fixes
- Refactoring
- Behavior changes
Exceptions (ask your human partner):
- Throwaway prototypes
- Generated code
- Configuration files
Thinking "skip TDD just this once"? Stop. That's rationalization.
The Iron Law
NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST
Write code before the test? Delete it. Start over.
TDD's Iron Law is one instance of the Production-Grade Doctrine — the no-shortcuts posture applied to tests.
No exceptions:
- Don't keep it as "reference"
- Don't "adapt" it while writing tests
- Don't look at it
- Delete means delete
Implement fresh from tests. Period.
Red-Green-Refactor
digraph tdd_cycle {
rankdir=LR;
red [label="RED\nWrite failing test", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ffcccc"];
verify_red [label="Verify fails\ncorrectly", shape=diamond];
green [label="GREEN\nMinimal code", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccffcc"];
verify_green [label="Verify passes\nAll green", shape=diamond];
refactor [label="REFACTOR\nClean up", shape=box, style=filled, fillcolor="#ccccff"];
next [label="Next", shape=ellipse];
red -> verify_red;
verify_red -> green [label="yes"];
verify_red -> red [label="wrong\nfailure"];
green -> verify_green;
verify_green -> refactor [label="yes"];
verify_green -> green [label="no"];
refactor -> verify_green [label="stay\ngreen"];
verify_green -> next;
next -> red;
}
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 343 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 4367c0a8365e
test-driven-development is a skill published in the GitHub repository DollarDill/beads-superpowers (26 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,514 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
workflows-driven-development
Dynamic build workflow: plans a goal into tasks, builds each test-first, and reviews every step.
test-driven-development-codex
Enforce strict test-driven development via Codex-backed implementation. Use only when the user explicitly asks for the Codex-backed TDD workflow.
beads-onboard
This skill should be used when the user asks to "onboard beads", "set up beads conventions", "configure beads for this project", "set up project labels", "improve my beads quality", "run beads onboard", "upgrade beads conventions", "re-run beads onboard", or when a project has .beads/ but no .beads/conventions/…
tdd
Guides test-driven development — decomposes a feature or bug fix into testable behaviors, then runs Red-Green-Refactor cycles with a failing test before every implementation. Auto-detects specs from docs/specs/ or docs/jira/, creates a feature branch (optional worktree), commits per cycle, and pushes. Recommends…
auto-loop
TDD-based autonomous development loop with checkpoint recovery and observability changelog.
workflow
Run the complete 5-step development workflow: focus problem → prevent over-development → test-first (TDD) → document → smart commit. Use when starting a new feature, or when the user runs /workflow or asks for the full development flow.