Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex --skill test-driven-development-codexgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/test-driven-development-codex)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/test-driven-development-codex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/test-driven-development-codex/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/test-driven-development-codex"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex/test-driven-development-codex.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01102 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00441 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00220 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
test-driven-development-codex scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test-Driven Development
Keep Claude in the main thread for user interaction and task acceptance.
Call the codex_implement MCP tool with promptTemplate: "tdd" for TDD-disciplined implementation. Use codex_resume for fix loops if TDD discipline is violated.
Reference testing-anti-patterns.md when reviewing Codex output for testing quality.
Overview
Tests written after code prove nothing — passing tests don't confirm they test the right thing.
Core principle: NO PRODUCTION CODE WITHOUT A FAILING TEST FIRST.
Announce at start: "I'm using the test-driven-development skill to implement this with strict red-green-refactor discipline."
The Iron Law
If you didn't watch the test fail, you don't know if it tests the right thing.
If Codex returns implementation without red-green evidence, reject it and resume with TDD enforcement.
When to Use
- Any implementation task where test coverage is critical
- New features, bug fixes, refactors where behavior must be verified
- When the user explicitly requests TDD methodology
Workflow
Step 1: Verify Task Readiness
- Task has clear acceptance criteria
- Test framework is identified (check existing test files)
- Codex CLI is available
If acceptance criteria are unclear, ask the user before dispatching.
Step 2: Call codex_implement with TDD Prompt Template
Call the codex_implement MCP tool with promptTemplate: "tdd":
{
"tool": "codex_implement",
"arguments": {
"taskId": "task-17",
"promptTemplate": "tdd",
"prompt": "Implement the requested behavior with strict red-green-refactor discipline. Write the failing test first, then the minimal production change, then refactor only if the tests still pass.",
"workspaceRoot": "/absolute/path/to/your/repo"
}
}
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 130 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A fbaa4cb56d48
test-driven-development-codex is a skill published in the GitHub repository mzored/superpowers-cc-to-codex (7 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,102 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
linked-intent-dev
Guide for linked-intent development (LID). Consult for ALL code changes. Walks changes through a mode-aware six-phase workflow (HLD → LLD → EARS → intent-narrowing edge audit → tests-first → code) with mandatory stops between each phase. Bugs walk the arrow like any other change — no short-circuit. Enforces cascade…
auto-loop
TDD-based autonomous development loop with checkpoint recovery and observability changelog.
workflow
Run the complete 5-step development workflow: focus problem → prevent over-development → test-first (TDD) → document → smart commit. Use when starting a new feature, or when the user runs /workflow or asks for the full development flow.
test-first
Drive one feature through a strict TDD Red-Green-Refactor cycle with checklists for each phase. Use when implementing new functionality test-first, or when the user runs /test-first.
writing-plans
Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code.
test-driven-development
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code.