Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DominikTobureto/awesome-grok-build --skill repo-health-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DominikTobureto/awesome-grok-buildWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dominiktobureto/awesome-grok-build/repo-health-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dominiktobureto/awesome-grok-build/repo-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dominiktobureto/awesome-grok-build/repo-health-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dominiktobureto/awesome-grok-build/repo-health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dominiktobureto/awesome-grok-build/repo-health-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00631 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00126 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00063 |
Grade A, and why
repo-health-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Repo Health Check
Find the smallest useful change with the best risk/reward ratio.
Grok Build Mode
- Start in Plan Mode for unfamiliar repos or when changes may touch multiple subsystems.
- Use subagents for parallel read-only discovery when the repo is medium/large:
structure: map stack, entry points, and package managers.quality: find test, lint, typecheck, CI, and coverage signals.docs: compare README commands with real config.safety: inspect.gitignore,.grokignore, secrets patterns, hooks, and AGENTS.md.
- Arena-style comparison: if Grok Build exposes Arena Mode, run candidate-first-PR proposals against 3-5 agents and rank by verification confidence. Otherwise simulate by asking subagents for independent candidates.
Workflow
- Read repo instructions:
AGENTS.md,README.md, package/config files, CI files. - Identify project type, main runtime, package manager, and quality gates.
- Look for high-signal risks:
- stale or missing setup docs;
- absent tests around core behavior;
- failing lint/type/test commands;
- generated output committed unexpectedly;
- missing
.grokignoreor obvious secret exposure; - dependency and lockfile mismatch;
- unsafe hooks or unclear agent instructions.
- Produce 3 candidate PRs ranked by impact, size, blast radius, and verification confidence.
- Ask for human approval before edits.
- Implement only the chosen candidate.
- Run the smallest relevant lint/test/type/docs check.
- Summarize changed files and residual risks.
Git Discipline
- Never commit generated junk, secrets, or local agent state.
- Keep the first PR tiny.
- If tests fail for unrelated reasons, capture the exact failure and avoid broad cleanup.
Example Prompts
Use repo-health-check. Inspect this repo and propose the smallest safe PR we should ship first. Do not edit yet.
Run repo-health-check with subagents for structure, tests, docs, and safety. Rank the top 3 fixes and wait for my approval.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 80 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A f91943f03c89
repo-health-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository DominikTobureto/awesome-grok-build (61 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 631 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
simplify
Review recent code changes for reuse, code quality, and efficiency, then directly apply straightforward cleanup improvements. Use when the user wants a post-implementation cleanup pass, pre-PR polish, or asks to simplify/refine recent changes. Invoke with /simplify or /simplify .
triage
Gatekeep and review GitHub issues and pull requests for Qwen Code maintainers. Use for GitHub Action issue triage, PR admission checks, product-direction review, KISS-focused PR review, and staged bilingual GitHub comments.
autofix
Review and repair current local changes until they converge, or run Qwen Code Autofix issue and review workflows from GitHub Actions.
find-simplifications
Use for a periodic repo-wide sweep of qwen-code for accumulated excess surface — dead components and files, orphaned locale keys, exports nothing consumes, added-then-removed scaffolding — filing candidates on a tracking issue and landing only what a maintainer has said yes to. Repo-wide and evidence-first; every…
cua-driver
Drive a native GUI app (macOS, Windows, Linux) via the Qwen Cua Driver CLI (default) or MCP server; snapshot its accessibility tree, act through snapshot-bound element tokens, native menu paths, exact window geometry, or pixel coordinates, and verify from fresh state. Use when the user asks you to operate, drive…
codegraph
Analyze indexed codebases via graph database (neug) and vector index (zvec). Covers call graphs, dependencies, dead code, hotspots, module coupling, architecture reports, semantic search, impact analysis, bug root cause from GitHub issues, class diagrams (UML), and PR review (risk scoring, conflict detection…