Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/doodledood/manifest-dev/donpx skills add doodledood/manifest-dev --skill dogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/doodledood/manifest-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/doodledood/manifest-dev/do)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/doodledood/manifest-dev/do"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/doodledood/manifest-dev/do.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00052 | $0.06638 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.03319 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01328 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00664 |
Grade A, and why
do scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 165 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Execution
What binds the run
Work toward the manifest's Deliverables in the order listed. Acceptance Criteria and Global Invariants are the binding layer — they are what the run owes, and gates are the only thing that can hold it open. Process Guidance is advisory: recommendations on how to work, weighed rather than enforced, and set aside when the work is better for it — name every departure on whichever terminal path the run takes — completion summary, escalation payload, or pending summary — and in the execution log too when a log is being kept, since advisory only stays safe while departing stays visible. The Initial Approach and the Deliverable order are likewise plan, not contract: pivot either when reality diverges, and name the deviation the same way a departure is named. Resequence when execution changes what the order was built on — a real dependency the order missed, or a shift in which Deliverable is now least proven, since proving the leading approach is exactly what ordering by uncertainty is for. Every judgment the run weighs rather than obeys — departing from Process Guidance, pivoting the Initial Approach, resequencing, choosing what stays below a bar on a terminal path — steers by the manifest's Intent: better than the Problem's baseline story, within the size the Appetite says the problem is worth, comparing down to that baseline rather than up to an ideal.
Running gate evaluations
Resolve execution policy before implementation starts. --verification accepts per-gate, consolidated, or self and defaults to per-gate; after resolving that default, load exactly one matching reference: references/per-gate-verification.md, references/consolidated-verification.md, or references/self-verification.md. The selected reference owns evaluator topology, evaluator provenance, and mode-specific evidence wording for completion and unattended backstops. --verifier-model <model> is optional and applies to the independent modes: when supplied, use it for every verifier execution and reject the policy before work if the active host cannot honor that selector; when omitted, verifier executions inherit the invoking context's model choice. The selected mode, the verifier-model provenance, and whether --exhaustive-verification is in force are fixed for the run and never change in response to cost, elapsed rounds, findings, or model preference. A later invocation changing any of them — including adding or dropping the flag — starts a new run with a fresh gate ledger rather than mixing evidence provenance. None of them is written into the Manifest.
What ships with it
5 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 165 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A c6b928d4f905
do is a skill published in the GitHub repository doodledood/manifest-dev (72 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 6,638 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
update-lid
Configure or reconcile a project for linked-intent development (LID). Dispatches on project state — fresh bootstrap, append directives to an existing agent-instructions file (AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md), add missing mode marker, reconcile convention drift, or run mode transitions. Invoked as /update-lid. For fresh…
map-codebase
Bootstrap LID in an existing (brownfield) codebase. Deep-reads every file in the declared scope, offers lens-based clustering options, generates skeleton LLDs/HLD/EARS bottom-up, then creates arrow docs and prompts the user to flesh out the skeletons. Token-intensive by design. Use when asked to map a codebase…
bidirectional-differential
Audit coherence across an arrow of intent by running two parallel fresh Claude sessions — one reconstructs code from a single EARS, the other reconstructs the EARS from stripped code — then classifies the drift between them. Use when the user invokes /differential-audit, asks to audit EARS-to-code drift for a feature…
fix
Разобраться, когда человек говорит «что-то сломалось» или «не работает», и назвать конкретное звено системы, а не человека. Использовать, когда пользователь пишет /fix, жалуется «ничего не происходит», «опять ошибка», «не запускается», или явно не понимает, что пошло не так. По-английски: «it doesn't work», «something…
what
Сказать человеку одной строкой, где он сейчас в работе с системой, и что сделать дальше. Использовать, когда пользователь пишет /what, спрашивает «где я», «что дальше», «что сейчас происходит», «на чём я остановился», говорит «where am I», «what's next», «what is going on», или явно потерял нить работы. Не меню и не…
refresh
Bring this project's Clawness rules up to date with the framework version it actually runs. Establishes what is installed and what the codebase uses, looks up what changed since the rules were verified, and writes version-corrected overrides into .clawness/rules/ — reporting the list and stopping for approval before…