.NET MAUI is a C# and XAML framework for building native mobile and desktop applications from one shared codebase. Developers use it to create apps for Android, iOS, iPadOS, macOS, and Windows. The catalogue entries provide skills, instructions, and agents for working with .NET MAUI.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dotnet/maui/verify-tests-fail-without-fixnpx skills add dotnet/maui --skill verify-tests-fail-without-fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dotnet/mauiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotnet/maui/verify-tests-fail-without-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dotnet/maui/verify-tests-fail-without-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dotnet/maui/verify-tests-fail-without-fix.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.02578 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01289 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00516 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00258 |
Grade A, and why
verify-tests-fail-without-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 265 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Tests Fail Without Fix
Verifies tests actually catch the issue. Supports all test types (UI tests, unit tests, XAML tests, device tests) and two workflow modes.
Supported Test Types
| Test Type | Auto-Detected From | Runner |
|---|---|---|
| UITest | TestCases.Shared.Tests/, TestCases.HostApp/ |
BuildAndRunHostApp.ps1 |
| DeviceTest | DeviceTests/ |
Run-DeviceTests.ps1 |
| UnitTest | *.UnitTests/, Graphics.Tests/ |
dotnet test |
| XamlUnitTest | Xaml.UnitTests/ |
dotnet test |
Test type is auto-detected from changed files. Override with -TestType if needed.
-Platform is required for UI and Device tests. It selects which platform to verify the fix on. Unit and XAML tests do not require -Platform.
Activation Guard
🛑 This skill ONLY verifies that existing tests reproduce a bug. Do NOT activate for:
- Writing new tests → use write-tests-agent
- Running tests without verification context → use run-device-tests
- Code review → use code-review skill
- General test advice
Requires: a platform and either test files in the PR or an explicit TestFilter.
⚠️ CRITICAL: Inverted Pass/Fail Semantics
In this skill, test outcomes mean the OPPOSITE of normal:
| Test Result (without fix) | Verification Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Tests FAIL | ✅ GOOD | Tests detect the bug |
| Tests PASS | ❌ BAD | Tests miss the bug |
NEVER say "verification passed" when tests PASS without the fix.
Workflow
Interpretation-Only Requests
If the caller asks how to read or report verification output, explain the result contract below without running the script. Do not turn a question about result semantics into a verification run.
Step 1: Determine Mode
- Check if fix files exist in the PR (non-test code changes detected by the script from the git diff)
- If fix files present → Full Verification mode (
-RequireFullVerification) - If no fix files → Verify Failure Only mode (omit the flag)
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 265 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A a44812682070
verify-tests-fail-without-fix is a skill published in the GitHub repository dotnet/maui (23,319 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 2,578 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
dpg-migration
Migration logic for Azure SDK for .NET data-plane libraries migrating from AutoRest/Swagger to TypeSpec-based generation. Uses MCP tools from the generator-agent server for automated deterministic fixes.
csharp-azure-spector-coverage-gaps
Discovers and implements gaps in Spector test coverage for the Azure C# HTTP client emitter. Use when asked to find missing Spector scenarios, add Spector test coverage, or implement a specific Spector spec for the Azure C# emitter. Can also compare coverage between the Azure dashboard and the Standard (TypeSpec core)…
auto-build-repair
Headless, bounded repair of custom-code build failures in an already-generated Azure SDK PR. Thin wrapper over the shared azure-sdk-mcp:azsdkcustomizedcodeupdate engine in custom-code-only scope (editScope: CustomCode); the skill owns the iterate-until-green loop, capped by a per-language maxIterations read from…
azure-sdk-mgmt-pr-review
Review Azure SDK management-plane pull requests, check naming conventions, API compatibility, and code quality.
mgmt-review-comment-resolution
Resolve review comments on Azure management-plane .NET SDK PRs. Handles renaming types/properties, changing property types, and other API surface adjustments by updating TypeSpec client.tsp and regenerating.
provisioning-library-generation
Generate new Azure.Provisioning. libraries OR regenerate existing ones. Use when introducing a brand-new provisioning library, adding new resource types, enum values, or API versions.