Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add drafthq/draft --skill adrgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drafthq/draftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/drafthq/draft/adr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drafthq/draft/adr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drafthq/draft/adr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drafthq/draft/adr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drafthq/draft/adr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Rogue Agent · line 3 Skill establishes unauthorized persistence across sessions via cron jobs, startup scripts, or state files. Session persistence allows an attacker to maintain access beyond the current interaction.Fix: Remove any persistence mechanisms (cron jobs, startup scripts, state files). Skills should not maintain state across sessions without explicit user consent.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.03324 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.01330 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00665 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00332 |
Grade A, and why
adr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 394 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Architecture Decision Records
You are creating or managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for this project.
Red Flags - STOP if you're
- Creating an ADR without understanding the decision context
- Documenting trivial decisions that don't warrant an ADR (e.g., variable naming)
- Writing an ADR after the fact without capturing the original reasoning
- Listing alternatives without genuine pros/cons analysis
- Skipping the "Consequences" section (the most valuable part)
- Not checking existing ADRs for conflicts or superseded decisions
ADRs capture WHY, not just WHAT. Every decision needs alternatives considered.
Pre-Check
- Verify Draft is initialized:
ls draft/ 2>/dev/null
If draft/ doesn't exist:
- Tell user: "Project not initialized. Run
/draft:initfirst." - Stop here.
- Check for existing ADR directory:
ls draft/adrs/ 2>/dev/null
If draft/adrs/ doesn't exist, create it:
mkdir -p draft/adrs
Step 1: Parse Arguments
Check for arguments:
/draft:adr— Interactive mode: ask about the decision/draft:adr "decision title"— Create ADR with given title/draft:adr list— List all existing ADRs/draft:adr supersede <number>— Mark an ADR as superseded
List Mode
If argument is list:
-
Prefer the deterministic
adr-index.shwrapper for the listing — it returns a structured JSON{adrs:[{id,title,date,status,path,related_tracks}]}derived from each ADR's frontmatter. Resolve via the canonical tool resolver (see core/shared/tool-resolver.md):DRAFT_TOOLS="${DRAFT_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(cat ~/.cache/draft/plugin-root 2>/dev/null)}/scripts/tools" [ -d "$DRAFT_TOOLS" ] || DRAFT_TOOLS="$(ls -d ~/.claude/plugins/cache/*/draft/*/scripts/tools 2>/dev/null | sort -V | tail -1)" [ -d "$DRAFT_TOOLS" ] || DRAFT_TOOLS="$(ls -d ~/.claude/plugins/marketplaces/*draft*/scripts/tools 2>/dev/null | tail -1)" [ -d "$DRAFT_TOOLS" ] || DRAFT_TOOLS="$PWD/scripts/tools" if [ -x "$DRAFT_TOOLS/adr-index.sh" ]; then bash "$DRAFT_TOOLS/adr-index.sh" --root draft/adrs else ls draft/adrs/ # fallback: enumerate files manually fi
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 394 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 05046bb28f2a
adr is a skill published in the GitHub repository drafthq/draft (40 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 3,324 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
gentle-ai-collab-perfect
Trigger: contributing to Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai as an external collaborator. Strict issue-first workflow, honest PR bodies, contributor-vs-maintainer scope, chained-PR strategy, verification protocol, docstring coverage. Load whenever the active repo is Gentleman-Programming/gentle-ai and any part of the…
issue-creation
Trigger: issue creation, bug reports, feature requests, or issue approval. Create and triage GitHub issues from repository evidence.
branch-pr
Create Gentle AI pull requests with issue-first checks. Trigger: creating, opening, or preparing PRs for review.
skill-creator
Trigger: new skills, agent instructions, documenting AI usage patterns. Create LLM-first skills with valid frontmatter.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
cognitive-doc-design
Design docs that reduce cognitive load. Trigger: writing guides, READMEs, RFCs, onboarding, architecture, or review-facing docs.