Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste --skill data-privacy-uxgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Dragoon0x/everything-design-tasteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/data-privacy-ux)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/data-privacy-ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/data-privacy-ux/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/data-privacy-ux"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dragoon0x/everything-design-taste/data-privacy-ux.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00322 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00129 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00064 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00032 |
Grade A, and why
data-privacy-ux scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Data Privacy UX
Consent Patterns
Cookie Banner
- Equal visual weight for Accept and Reject
- Don't use dark patterns (tiny reject link, pre-checked boxes)
- Granular options (essential, analytics, marketing)
- Remember choice (don't ask every visit)
Permission Requests
- Ask in context (when user is about to use the feature)
- Explain why you need it (before the system prompt)
- Show what they get in return
- Allow using the product without granting (degrade gracefully)
Data Collection Rules
- Collect minimum necessary data
- Explain what you collect and why (plain language, not legal)
- Show what data you have about the user (data export)
- Allow deletion (right to be forgotten)
- Don't pre-check marketing consent boxes
- Separate essential consent from optional consent
Transparency
- Privacy settings easily findable (not buried 5 levels deep)
- Clear labels: 'We share this with partners' not 'Third-party data sharing'
- Notify users of policy changes before they take effect
- Show data retention periods
Anti-Patterns
- Dark patterns that make opting out difficult
- 'Accept All' as the only prominent button
- Requiring account creation to view privacy policy
- Collecting data not needed for the service
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 80d243460c69
data-privacy-ux is a skill published in the GitHub repository Dragoon0x/everything-design-taste (13 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 322 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
antislop
Anti Slop: Rules for AI Coding Agents. The core filter. Load always to stop generic AI slop.
antislop-human
Human and accessibility skill for antislop. Contrast, keyboard, focus, and states for real people. Includes the contrast checker.
antislop-ui
UI and visual skill for antislop. Use when building or editing any interface: color, layout, components, motion. Load with the core.
role-ui-ux-designer
Use when orchestrating UI/UX design systems, anti-AI-slop frontend styling, tactile micro-interactions, responsive design tokens, accessibility standards, and high-fidelity interface engineering.
a11y-audit
Dedicated WCAG 2.2 AA/AAA accessibility audit across 10 dimensions (A1-A10) covering semantic HTML, keyboard navigation, ARIA patterns, color contrast, forms, images/media, responsive/zoom, motion/animation, reading/content, and legal compliance. Goes far beyond surface-level design-review checks with deep…
taste
Anti-slop frontend engineering directive and design taste system. Enforces brief inference, dynamic design dials, absolute prohibition of AI visual tells, and 100% full-output completion.