Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/greglas75/zuvonpx agentmods add skills/greglas75/zuvo/a11y-auditWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/greglas75/zuvo/a11y-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/greglas75/zuvo/a11y-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/greglas75/zuvo/a11y-audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 391 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 332 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 333 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00147 | $0.08904 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00073 | $0.04452 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01781 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00890 |
Grade A, and why
a11y-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 687 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
zuvo:a11y-audit — WCAG 2.2 Accessibility Audit
Deep, compliance-focused accessibility audit across 10 weighted dimensions with WCAG 2.2 criterion mapping, legal risk assessment, and actionable fix generation. Every finding maps to a specific WCAG success criterion and severity level.
When to use: Before public launches, when targeting WCAG compliance, after ADA/EAA legal requirements surface, periodic accessibility health checks, when onboarding a codebase that must meet compliance standards, after adding interactive components or forms.
Out of scope: Surface-level design consistency (zuvo:design-review), visual design quality (zuvo:ui-design-team), code quality (zuvo:code-audit), penetration testing (zuvo:pentest).
Argument Parsing
Parse $ARGUMENTS for these flags:
| Argument | Effect |
|---|---|
[path] |
Audit a specific directory or component |
full |
Audit the entire project |
--live-url <url> |
Enable browser-based testing (axe-core via MCP) |
--quick |
Critical gates only (A2 Keyboard, A4 Contrast) |
--fix |
Generate fix code for all findings |
--standard AA|AAA |
Compliance level (default: AA) |
--legal ada|eaa|508 |
Focus on a specific legal standard |
--max-files [N] |
Cap audit to N files (default: 40) |
--persist-backlog |
Emit backlog entries for CRITICAL/HIGH findings |
| Mode | Scope | Phases | Browser |
|---|---|---|---|
[path] |
Directory/component | 0-5 | No |
full |
Entire project | 0-5 | No |
--live-url |
Project + URL | 0-5 incl. Phase 2 browser | Yes |
--quick |
Project | 0, 1 (A2+A4 only), 5 | No |
Mandatory File Loading
Read these files before any work begins. Print the checklist with status.
Stage 1 -- Before Phase 0 (STOP if any missing):
CORE FILES LOADED:
1. ../../shared/includes/codesift-setup.md -- [READ | MISSING -> STOP]
2. ../../shared/includes/env-compat.md -- [READ | MISSING -> STOP]
Stage 2 -- Before Phase 5 (report writing):
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 687 lines · 147 tokens per session scan A f073e1c30b12
a11y-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository greglas75/zuvo (6 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 147 tokens to every session and 8,904 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ss-review
Review UI code for design system compliance, accessibility, and best practices.
ring:adding-multi-tenancy
Adding database-per-tenant isolation into a Go service end-to-end via an 11-gate cycle: detects the stack, audits compliance, then dispatches backend agents to implement tenantId-from-JWT routing through the lib-commons v5 dispatch layer (config, middleware, repositories, metrics, tests) and runs reviewers. Use when…
ring:checking-frontend-quality
Checking frontend quality against changed UI via ring:qa-frontend in accessibility, visual, e2e, or performance mode and aggregating pass/fail verdicts. Use when a frontend change needs standalone a11y, visual-snapshot, Playwright e2e, or Lighthouse/Core-Web-Vitals validation outside the dev cycle. Skip for…
ring:testing-skills-with-subagents
Hardening a skill so it resists rationalization under pressure: run combined-pressure scenarios on a subagent without the skill (RED), capture excuses verbatim, write/edit the skill (GREEN), then plug loopholes (REFACTOR) until compliance holds. Use when deploying or editing a discipline-enforcing skill that an agent…
peekaboo
Provides runtime observation and interaction for native macOS interfaces through accessibility state and screenshots. Use when the task depends on visible or interactive state in a running SwiftUI/AppKit app: what is rendered, focused, selected, enabled, reachable through menus/windows/dialogs, or experienced across a…
kanso-audit
Use when the user asks for a code review, audit, pre-PR check, quality sweep, or pattern analysis of a diff, branch, module, or codebase. Also use when the user asks to "check" or "look over" their code for issues.