Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dralkh/iktinah --skill literature-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dralkh/iktinahWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralkh/iktinah/literature-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralkh/iktinah/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dralkh/iktinah/literature-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralkh/iktinah/literature-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dralkh/iktinah/literature-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.06814 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.03407 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.01363 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00681 |
Grade C, and why
literature-review scanned grade C with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Downloads and executes remote codehighSupply chain
curl | sh runs whatever the server returns today, which is not necessarily what it returned when this was reviewed.
curl -fsSL https://parallel.ai/install.sh | bash Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
curl -fsSL https://parallel.ai/install.sh | bash This is a copy
94% identical to literature-review — 15 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 711 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Literature Review
Overview
Conduct systematic, comprehensive literature reviews following rigorous academic methodology. Search multiple literature databases, synthesize findings thematically, verify all citations for accuracy, and generate professional output documents in markdown and PDF formats.
This skill uses the parallel-web skill (parallel-cli search) as the primary web search tool for broad academic literature discovery, supplemented by specialized database access skills (gget, bioservices, datacommons-client). It provides specialized tools for citation verification, result aggregation, and document generation.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Conducting a systematic literature review for research or publication
- Synthesizing current knowledge on a specific topic across multiple sources
- Performing meta-analysis or scoping reviews
- Writing the literature review section of a research paper or thesis
- Investigating the state of the art in a research domain
- Identifying research gaps and future directions
- Requiring verified citations and professional formatting
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
⚠️ MANDATORY: Every literature review MUST include at least 1-2 AI-generated figures using the scientific-schematics skill.
This is not optional. Literature reviews without visual elements are incomplete. Before finalizing any document:
- Generate at minimum ONE schematic or diagram (e.g., PRISMA flow diagram for systematic reviews)
- Prefer 2-3 figures for comprehensive reviews (search strategy flowchart, thematic synthesis diagram, conceptual framework)
How to generate figures:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
How to generate schematics:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/review_template.md 13 KB
- references/citation_styles.md 6.0 KB
- references/database_strategies.md 15 KB
- scripts/generate_pdf.py 5.3 KB runs code
- scripts/generate_schematic_ai.py 32 KB runs code
- scripts/generate_schematic.py 5.0 KB runs code
- scripts/search_databases.py 8.8 KB runs code
- scripts/verify_citations.py 6.9 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 711 lines · 86 tokens per session scan C bd2db633e156
literature-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository dralkh/iktinah (77 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 6,814 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 2 findings (downloads and executes remote code, makes network calls). It is 94% identical to literature-review, differing in 15 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
sci-extract
Read an academic paper end to end and extract professional research insights, figures, metadata, and critique. Use this skill whenever the user shares a scientific paper, review paper, survey paper, systematic review, meta-analysis, scoping review, arXiv link, DOI, PDF, or pasted paper text and asks to read…
sci-polish
Two-stage academic paper polishing skill. Stage A reduces AI detection traces (targeting GPTZero, Turnitin, Originality.ai). Stage B performs 8-dimension quality improvement (grammar, tone, coherence, conciseness, terminology, structure, argument clarity, journal compliance). Use whenever the user asks to polish…
sci-ppt
Generate professional academic PowerPoint (PPTX) presentations from paper PDFs, structured outlines, or plain text. Use for thesis defense, seminar reports, literature presentations, and graduate school applications. Supports automatic figure extraction, LaTeX formula rendering, and bilingual (Chinese/English) layouts.
econ-compass
Your compass for navigating economics literature. Find the most important, must-read papers in any economics field or research area — from broad subfields like labor economics or macroeconomics to narrow topics like 'carbon pricing' or 'digitalization and firm innovation'. This skill curates essential reading lists by…
kami-deck
A lab-meeting deck on gut-microbiome links to sleep quality — the design, the results, the caveats, and the next experiment. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for lab group, PI.
html-ppt-zhangzara-monochrome
A grant proposal on CRISPR base-editing for sickle-cell disease — the hypothesis, the approach, the milestones, and the risk. Built as a decision-grade academic research deck for grant review committee.