Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add dralkh/iktinah --skill scholar-evaluationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dralkh/iktinahWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralkh/iktinah/scholar-evaluation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralkh/iktinah/scholar-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dralkh/iktinah/scholar-evaluation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dralkh/iktinah/scholar-evaluation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dralkh/iktinah/scholar-evaluation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.02484 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01242 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00497 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00248 |
Grade A, and why
scholar-evaluation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to scholar-evaluation — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 299 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scholar Evaluation
Overview
Apply the ScholarEval framework to systematically evaluate scholarly and research work. This skill provides structured evaluation methodology based on peer-reviewed research assessment criteria, enabling comprehensive analysis of academic papers, research proposals, literature reviews, and scholarly writing across multiple quality dimensions.
When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Evaluating research papers for quality and rigor
- Assessing literature review comprehensiveness and quality
- Reviewing research methodology design
- Scoring data analysis approaches
- Evaluating scholarly writing and presentation
- Providing structured feedback on academic work
- Benchmarking research quality against established criteria
- Assessing publication readiness for target venues
- Providing quantitative evaluation to complement qualitative peer review
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
When creating documents with this skill, always consider adding scientific diagrams and schematics to enhance visual communication.
If your document does not already contain schematics or diagrams:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
For new documents: Scientific schematics should be generated by default to visually represent key concepts, workflows, architectures, or relationships described in the text.
How to generate schematics:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
When to add schematics:
- Evaluation framework diagrams
- Quality assessment criteria decision trees
- Scholarly workflow visualizations
- Assessment methodology flowcharts
- Scoring rubric visualizations
- Evaluation process diagrams
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 299 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 821e0d16faf6
scholar-evaluation is a skill published in the GitHub repository dralkh/iktinah (77 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 2,484 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to scholar-evaluation, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
sci-extract
Read an academic paper end to end and extract professional research insights, figures, metadata, and critique. Use this skill whenever the user shares a scientific paper, review paper, survey paper, systematic review, meta-analysis, scoping review, arXiv link, DOI, PDF, or pasted paper text and asks to read…
sci-polish
Two-stage academic paper polishing skill. Stage A reduces AI detection traces (targeting GPTZero, Turnitin, Originality.ai). Stage B performs 8-dimension quality improvement (grammar, tone, coherence, conciseness, terminology, structure, argument clarity, journal compliance). Use whenever the user asks to polish…
sci-search
Academic paper search and metrics analysis. Searches arXiv, PubMed, Web of Science, Springer Nature, Scopus, Semantic Scholar, and OpenAlex simultaneously with journal impact factor data. Triggers on requests to search for papers or find literature.
sci-figure
A tool for finding and saving figures and smaller panels from academic PDF papers as PNG images. It recognizes common figure types and labels such as (a), (b), and (i).
sci-html
Generate academic presentation-style HTML slide decks and browser reports from PDFs, structured text, Markdown, paper summaries, outlines, or research notes. Use whenever the user wants to convert a scientific paper PDF directly into an interactive HTML report, clickable web presentation, shareable browser deck, or…
sci-download
An academic-paper PDF downloader that supports eight research sources and routes requests by DOI, a paper's persistent identifier. For unknown DOI formats, it tries Unpaywall and then Semantic Scholar.