Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/drivestream-lab/prayog-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/drivestream-lab/prayog-skills/ensure-repo-graphWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/drivestream-lab/prayog-skills/ensure-repo-graph)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drivestream-lab/prayog-skills/ensure-repo-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drivestream-lab/prayog-skills/ensure-repo-graph/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/drivestream-lab/prayog-skills/ensure-repo-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/drivestream-lab/prayog-skills/ensure-repo-graph.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.01375 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.00687 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00275 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00137 |
Grade A, and why
ensure-repo-graph scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 139 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ensure repo graph
Make in-depth code graphs available for the candidate fleet so
/prd-codebase-map can ground the PRD. Do not ask product questions.
Do not touch SDD gates.
Provider contract: ../references/codegraph-provider.md.
Handoff: ../references/handoff-adjunct.md.
NON-NEGOTIABLE
- This skill is gate-independent. Never create/update/delete
impact-map-*orspec-*labels. Never claim Gate 1 readiness. - Use the codegraph provider interface. Phase 1 default: local Graphify CLI.
- If Graphify (or configured provider) is missing → outcome
blockedwith install steps. No PASS and no “light skim” substitute. - Each repo must be on integration branch (default
develop) at a recorded SHA before build/update. - Prefer
--mode deepfor first build;--updatewhen graph exists but SHA changed. - Record per-repo
develop_sha+graph_digest(sha256 ofgraph.json). - No product questions. No PRD edits. No app PRs. No GitHub writes unless the user later authorizes unrelated actions outside this skill.
- Dual output: chat fleet table + optional saved status snippet under meta
prd/reports/when useful (Graph-Fleet-Status-{INIT}.md).
Inputs
- Initiative id — (REQUIRED) e.g.
INIT-001 - Candidate repos — (REQUIRED) from one of:
prd/reports/Impact-Map-{INIT}.mdaffected (+ optional transitive) list- PE-supplied list
- resolved
config/service-catalog*.yamlhint (only if PE confirms; same one-file resolver as/prd-impact-map— never hardcode a tenant org)
- Workspace layout — preferred:
{fleet}/pe-workspace/withfleet.yaml+graphs/{repo}/; app code at../{repo}; meta at../drivestream-meta(or{client}-meta). Legacy: cwd = meta with sibling../{repo}graphs (discouraged — pollutes app trees). - Integration branch — default
develop
Process
T0 — Gather
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 139 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A 33d995b39790
ensure-repo-graph is a skill published in the GitHub repository drivestream-lab/prayog-skills (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 1,375 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…