ocp: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md

speckit-analyze is a skill for Claude Code from dtzp555-max/ocp. It costs 32 tokens per session (2,374 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of speckit-analyze, MIT.

A consistency checker for three Spec Kit documents: the specification, implementation plan, and task list.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review whether spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md agree before implementation begins. It can also check configured pre-analysis extension hooks.
Why use it?
It finds contradictions or quality problems after tasks have been generated, without changing the documents.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: disable-model-invocation in frontmatter.

This is dtzp555-max/ocp's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on ocp itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything ocp configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to dtzp555-max/ocp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dtzp555-max/ocp/main/.claude/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/dtzp555-max/ocp

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for speckit-analyze

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dtzp555-max/ocp/speckit-analyze/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dtzp555-max/ocp/speckit-analyze)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dtzp555-max/ocp/speckit-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dtzp555-max/ocp/speckit-analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for speckit-analyze

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dtzp555-max/ocp/speckit-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dtzp555-max/ocp/speckit-analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,374 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 91% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.02374
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.01187
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00475
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00237

Measured 9d ago against content hash 17bd5f354c13, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

speckit-analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

91% identical to speckit-analyze — 25 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.claude/skills/speckit-analyze/SKILL.md · 260 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 260 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

User Input

$ARGUMENTS

You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).

Pre-Execution Checks

Check for extension hooks (before analysis):

  • Check if .specify/extensions.yml exists in the project root.
  • If it exists, read it and look for entries under the hooks.before_analyze key
  • If the YAML cannot be parsed or is invalid, skip hook checking silently and continue normally
  • Filter out hooks where enabled is explicitly false. Treat hooks without an enabled field as enabled by default.
  • For each remaining hook, do not attempt to interpret or evaluate hook condition expressions:
    • If the hook has no condition field, or it is null/empty, treat the hook as executable
    • If the hook defines a non-empty condition, skip the hook and leave condition evaluation to the HookExecutor implementation
  • When constructing slash commands from hook command names, replace dots (.) with hyphens (-). For example, speckit.git.commit -> /speckit-git-commit.
  • For each executable hook, output the following based on its optional flag:
    • Optional hook (optional: true):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Optional Pre-Hook**: {extension}
      Command: `/{command}`
      Description: {description}
      
      Prompt: {prompt}
      To execute: `/{command}`
      
    • Mandatory hook (optional: false):
      ## Extension Hooks
      
      **Automatic Pre-Hook**: {extension}
      Executing: `/{command}`
      EXECUTE_COMMAND: {command}
      
      Wait for the result of the hook command before proceeding to the Goal.
      
  • If no hooks are registered or .specify/extensions.yml does not exist, skip silently

Goal

Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md) before implementation. This command MUST run only after /speckit.tasks has successfully produced a complete tasks.md.

Operating Constraints

STRICTLY READ-ONLY: Do not modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).

Read the full file on GitHub · 260 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 260 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 17bd5f354c13

Subscribe to this mod's changes

speckit-analyze is a skill published in the GitHub repository dtzp555-max/ocp (107 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 2,374 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 91% identical to speckit-analyze, differing in 25 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

requesting-code-review

Pre-commit review: security scan, quality gates, auto-fix.

NousResearch/hermes-agent · 20 tokens

continual-learning

Nightly refinement of an existing per-repo review-style prompt using this reviewer's own finding outcomes. Read confirmed (resolved-by-commit / thumbs-up) and dismissed (thumbs-down) findings, promote the bug patterns the team actually fixes, demote the false-positive patterns, reconcile against the current prompt…

langchain-ai/open-swe · 89 tokens

meta-codereview-current-diff

Read the current uncommitted diff, run three independent reviewers (safety + tests-coverage + style) in parallel, then arbitrate a single BLOCK / BLOCKWITHOVERRIDE / PASSWITHNOTES verdict. Use before commit when you want a multi-perspective second-opinion instead of a single-reviewer agent loop.

opensquilla/opensquilla · 73 tokens

prs-awaiting-maintainer

List open pull requests where the ball is in the maintainer's court: CI is green and the PR is ready for a maintainer to review, re-review, or merge. Use when the user wants to see PRs awaiting maintainer action.

dyoshikawa/rulesync · 56 tokens

compliance-checker

Check affiliate content for FTC compliance and platform rules. Triggers on: "check my content for compliance", "FTC disclosure check", "is this legal", "review for compliance", "check affiliate disclosure", "am I FTC compliant", "audit my content", "compliance review", "legal check", "platform rules check", "check…

Affitor/affiliate-skills · 87 tokens

lean-review

CocoLean diff-scoped over-engineering audit — scans uncommitted git diff and applies five classification tags (delete/stdlib/native/yagni/shrink) to identify unnecessary surface area before commit.

Snowflake-Labs/cocoplus · 44 tokens