Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Affitor/affiliate-skills --skill compliance-checkergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Affitor/affiliate-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/affitor/affiliate-skills/compliance-checker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/affitor/affiliate-skills/compliance-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/affitor/affiliate-skills/compliance-checker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/affitor/affiliate-skills/compliance-checker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/affitor/affiliate-skills/compliance-checker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Anti-Refusal · line 85 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00087 | $0.02448 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01224 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00490 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00245 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-checker scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Strips warnings and disclaimerslowAnti-refusal
Omitting safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.
- **Fake testimonials**: results that aren't typical without disclaimer Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- compliance-checker — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- compliance-checker — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compliance Checker
Audit affiliate content for FTC compliance, platform-specific rules, and legal requirements. Checks disclosure placement, prohibited claims, endorsement guidelines, and platform policies. Output is a compliance scorecard with issues, severity, and fix suggestions.
Stage
S8: Meta — The FTC has fined affiliates $4.2M+ for undisclosed endorsements. One missing disclosure can result in legal action, platform bans, or program termination. This skill is the safety net — run it on any content before publishing to catch compliance issues before they become problems.
When to Use
- User wants to check content before publishing
- User asks about FTC rules or affiliate disclosure requirements
- User is unsure if their content is compliant
- User says "is this legal?", "do I need a disclosure?", "check my post"
- User is preparing content for a platform with strict ad policies (Facebook, Google)
- Chaining: run after any S2-S5 or S7 content-producing skill before publishing
- User wants to audit existing published content
Input Schema
content: string # REQUIRED — the content to check (text, markdown, or HTML)
content_type: string # REQUIRED — "social_post" | "blog" | "landing_page"
# | "email" | "ad" | "video_script"
platform: string # OPTIONAL — "linkedin" | "twitter" | "reddit" | "facebook"
# | "tiktok" | "youtube" | "google_ads" | "pinterest"
# Platform-specific rules applied if provided
claims: # OPTIONAL — specific claims to verify
- string # e.g., ["earn $10K/month", "guaranteed results"]
Chaining context: If content was produced by S2-S5 or S7 in the same conversation, pull it directly. The user should not have to paste content that was just generated.
Workflow
Step 1: Detect Affiliate Links
Scan content for:
- URLs with affiliate parameters (
ref=,aff=,partner=, UTM tags) - Shortened URLs (bit.ly, etc.) that may hide affiliate links
- Product mentions that imply a commercial relationship
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 220 lines · 87 tokens per session scan A b47585207949
compliance-checker is a skill published in the GitHub repository Affitor/affiliate-skills (656 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 87 tokens to every session and 2,448 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (strips warnings and disclaimers). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
compliance-checker
Check affiliate content for FTC compliance and platform rules. Triggers on: "check my content for compliance", "FTC disclosure check", "is this legal", "review for compliance", "check affiliate disclosure", "am I FTC compliant", "audit my content", "compliance review", "legal check", "platform rules check", "check…
compliance-checker
Check affiliate content for FTC compliance and platform rules. Triggers on: "check my content for compliance", "FTC disclosure check", "is this legal", "review for compliance", "check affiliate disclosure", "am I FTC compliant", "audit my content", "compliance review", "legal check", "platform rules check", "check…
self-improver
Review affiliate campaign results and improve strategy. Triggers on: "review my results", "what went wrong", "how to improve conversions", "analyze my campaign", "affiliate retrospective", "why am I not converting", "improve my strategy", "what should I change", "campaign review", "optimize my approach", "learn from…
disclosure-assessment
Produces a disclosure requirements brief for a specific piece of content, identifying what must be disclosed, under which regulatory framework, and in what format — covering FTC, ASA, UCPD, and platform-specific rules across all common media formats.
category-designer
Define a new category where your product wins by default. Reframe the buying decision. Triggers on: "create a category", "category design", "define my category", "category of one", "reframe the market", "position as category king", "new category", "category creation", "own a category", "category strategy"…
category-designer
Define a new category where your product wins by default. Reframe the buying decision. Triggers on: "create a category", "category design", "define my category", "category of one", "reframe the market", "position as category king", "new category", "category creation", "own a category", "category strategy"…