Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add duc01226/EasyPlatform --skill brainstormgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/duc01226/EasyPlatformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/duc01226/easyplatform/brainstorm)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/duc01226/easyplatform/brainstorm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/duc01226/easyplatform/brainstorm/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/duc01226/easyplatform/brainstorm"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/duc01226/easyplatform/brainstorm.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 8 findings, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Prompt Injection · line 19 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- high Prompt Injection · line 50 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- high Anti-Refusal · line 319 Skill instructs the agent to omit warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Stripping safety caveats hides risk from the user and is a common jailbreak preamble.Fix: Remove instructions that suppress warnings, disclaimers, or ethical commentary. Let the agent surface safety-relevant caveats to the user.
- high Prompt Injection · line 860 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- high Prompt Injection · line 930 Hidden instructions were detected in comments or invisible text. These could contain malicious directives. Manual review is recommended.Fix: Audit all comments and invisible characters. Remove any instructions that direct the agent to perform unauthorized actions. Use plain, reviewable content.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 889 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Prompt Injection · line 958 Large whitespace padding was detected (a block of blank lines or a long run of spaces). This can push injected instructions below or to the right of the visible area so a human reviewer never sees them while the agent still reads them. Manual review of the hidden content is recommended.Fix: Remove the large whitespace padding (blank-line blocks or long space runs) and review any content hidden below or to the right of it. Keep skill files compact and reviewable so no instructions can be
- medium Excessive Agency · line 981 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.10273 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.04109 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.02055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01027 |
Grade A, and why
brainstorm scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 778 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Codex compatibility note:
- Invoke
$skill-name: load the registered.agents/skills/<name>/SKILL.mdand execute it with Codex tools; no separateSkilltool or Claude mode switch is needed. Author.claude/**; mirrors are generated.- Track steps before execution and keep progress/evidence current. Explicit skill requests execute their protocol. Use the native question tool for required questions.
- Map foreign tool names to available host capabilities. A name mismatch needs no approval; an actually unavailable required capability stops with its step/evidence and a user question before adaptation.
- Subagent authorization: when a skill is user-invoked or AI-detected and its protocol requires subagents, that skill activation authorizes use of the required
spawn_agentsubagent(s) for that task.- Preserve protocol order unless the user approves a deviation. Workflows use
$start-workflow: gates stay fixed; other steps may flex with logged reasons and evidence.
[BLOCKING] Execute skill steps in declared order. NEVER skip, reorder, or merge steps without explicit user approval. Inside a workflow run,
$start-workflow→ Workflow-step mode bounds this rule. [BLOCKING] Before each step or sub-skill call, update todo tracking: setin_progresswhen step starts, setcompletedwhen step ends. [BLOCKING] Every completed/skipped step MUST include brief evidence or explicit skip reason. [BLOCKING] If Task tools are unavailable, create and maintain an equivalent step-by-step plan tracker with the same status transitions.
Quick Summary
Goal: Facilitate evidence-backed PO/BA Double-Diamond ideation that separates problem discovery from solution evaluation and delivers either a validated, ranked 3–5-candidate shortlist with problem/value hypotheses, each riskiest assumption, and cheapest validation test plus one recommendation—or, in Multi-Opportunity Discovery mode, a ranked 3–8-item RICE map for user selection—so the team commits to the right problem and solution, never a flat idea list.
Summary:
- Ordered core: P0 Setup (scenario/role/known + context) → P1 Problem Framing/diverge (POV, 5 Whys/Fishbone, JTBD, HMW) → P2 Opportunity Framing/converge (OST, Lean Canvas, ERRC, Value Proposition) → P3 Ideation/diverge (SCAMPER, Crazy 8s, Brainwriting, Impact Mapping, Analogy; 25–40 ideas) → P4 Evaluation/converge (Dot Vote, RICE, Kano, 2×2, MoSCoW; shortlist 3–5) → P5 Validation (problem/value cards, RAT, cheapest test, Build-Measure-Learn) → P6 Decision (one recommendation) → P7 Documentation/Handoff.
- Purpose and gates: Run
ask user question toolin P0 first; separate diverge from converge; test every top-3 candidate before build; Multi-Opportunity Discovery ranks 3–8 opportunities and uses multi-select. - Routing: Resolve
--mode=roadmap|scopebefore P0. Roadmap hands outcome/milestone framing to$product-roadmap; scope amends one approvedplans/{plan-id}/scope-brief.mdand stops before scenario/plan work (plans root defaultplans/;docsRoots.plans.pathindocs/project-config.jsonoverrides it). - Handoff boundary: Apply
isLargeIdea; when true, carry one completelarge_idea_decompositionblock in the owning handoff. Default mode offers user-selected handoff ($initiative,$work-item --mode=refine,$plan, etc.); Multi-Opportunity Discovery hands selected items to the per-opportunity task loop.
Workflow:
- Session Setup —
ask user question tooldetects scenario, role, known context; load domain or market context. - Problem Framing/diverge — POV, root cause when applicable, JTBD, HMW.
- Opportunity Framing/converge — scenario-specific OST, Lean Canvas, ERRC, Value Proposition.
- Ideation/diverge — SCAMPER, Crazy 8s, Brainwriting, Impact Mapping, Analogy; no judgment.
- Evaluation/converge — Dot Vote, RICE, Kano, 2×2, MoSCoW; rank 3–5 candidates or a 3–8 opportunity map.
- Hypothesis Validation — problem/value cards, RAT, cheapest test, Build-Measure-Learn for top 3.
- Decision, Documentation & Handoff — recommend one option by default; document and route user-approved next steps.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · -289 lines · +3 tokens per session ccb983d42596
- 1mo ago First seen · 1,067 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 593bfe6cbfc4
brainstorm is a skill published in the GitHub repository duc01226/EasyPlatform (12 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 10,273 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…