Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/dvnghiem/flowdeck/tdd-workflownpx skills add DVNghiem/FlowDeck --skill tdd-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DVNghiem/FlowDeckWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dvnghiem/flowdeck/tdd-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dvnghiem/flowdeck/tdd-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dvnghiem/flowdeck/tdd-workflow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00039 | $0.00778 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00389 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
tdd-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TDD Workflow Skill
Tests before code. Always. Red-Green-Refactor is not a suggestion.
When to Activate
Activate when:
- Implementing any new feature
- Fixing any bug
- Refactoring existing code
Core Principles
- Tests before code — write the failing test first, then the implementation
- Minimum implementation — write the least code that makes the test pass
- Refactor after green — clean up only when tests are passing
- 80%+ coverage — non-negotiable threshold
Workflow
Red — Write a Failing Test
Write a test that describes the behavior you want. It must fail before you write any implementation.
// AAA Pattern: Arrange, Act, Assert
describe('calculateDiscount', () => {
it('should apply 10% discount for premium users', () => {
// Arrange
const user = { tier: 'premium' };
const price = 100;
// Act
const result = calculateDiscount(price, user);
// Assert
expect(result).toBe(90);
});
it('should return full price for standard users', () => {
// Arrange
const user = { tier: 'standard' };
const price = 100;
// Act
const result = calculateDiscount(price, user);
// Assert
expect(result).toBe(100);
});
});
Run it: npm test → must fail with "cannot find function" or similar.
Green — Minimum Code to Pass
Write the minimum implementation:
function calculateDiscount(price: number, user: { tier: string }): number {
if (user.tier === 'premium') return price * 0.9;
return price;
}
Run it: npm test → must pass.
Refactor — Clean Up While Green
Now clean up the implementation:
const DISCOUNT_RATES: Record<string, number> = {
premium: 0.10,
};
function calculateDiscount(price: number, user: { tier: string }): number {
const discountRate = DISCOUNT_RATES[user.tier] ?? 0;
return price * (1 - discountRate);
}
Run it: npm test → must still pass.
Git Checkpoint
After each Red-Green-Refactor cycle:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 127 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 764ba2a9bbd2
tdd-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository DVNghiem/FlowDeck (24 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 778 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
oh-my-opencode-slim
Configure and improve oh-my-opencode-slim for the current user. Use when users want to tune agents, models, prompts, custom agents, skills, MCPs, presets, or plugin behavior. Also use when recurring workflow friction suggests a safe config or prompt improvement.
reflect
Review recent work, find repeated workflow patterns, and suggest reusable skills, agents, commands, config changes, or playbooks. Use when the user asks to learn from past sessions, improve recurring workflows, or identify what should be turned into reusable agent instructions.
clonedeps
Clone important project dependency source code into an ignored local workspace so OpenCode can inspect library internals. Use when the user asks to clone dependencies, inspect dependency/source internals, understand SDK/framework behavior from source, debug library implementation details, or make core dependency repos…
codemap
Generate comprehensive hierarchical codemaps for UNFAMILIAR repositories. Expensive operation - only use when explicitly asked for codebase documentation or initial repository mapping.
deepwork
High-cost orchestrator workflow for large, high-risk, multi-phase coding efforts with meaningful dependencies and review gates. Do not activate for routine multi-file changes.
worktrees
Manage Git worktrees as OMO safe isolated coding lanes for complex, risky, or parallel work.