Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add DVNghiem/FlowDeck --skill tdd-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/DVNghiem/FlowDeckWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/dvnghiem/flowdeck/tdd-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dvnghiem/flowdeck/tdd-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dvnghiem/flowdeck/tdd-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/dvnghiem/flowdeck/tdd-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/dvnghiem/flowdeck/tdd-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 114 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 115 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00778 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00311 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
tdd-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TDD Workflow Skill
Tests before code. Always. Red-Green-Refactor is not a suggestion.
When to Activate
Activate when:
- Implementing any new feature
- Fixing any bug
- Refactoring existing code
Core Principles
- Tests before code — write the failing test first, then the implementation
- Minimum implementation — write the least code that makes the test pass
- Refactor after green — clean up only when tests are passing
- 80%+ coverage — non-negotiable threshold
Workflow
Red — Write a Failing Test
Write a test that describes the behavior you want. It must fail before you write any implementation.
// AAA Pattern: Arrange, Act, Assert
describe('calculateDiscount', () => {
it('should apply 10% discount for premium users', () => {
// Arrange
const user = { tier: 'premium' };
const price = 100;
// Act
const result = calculateDiscount(price, user);
// Assert
expect(result).toBe(90);
});
it('should return full price for standard users', () => {
// Arrange
const user = { tier: 'standard' };
const price = 100;
// Act
const result = calculateDiscount(price, user);
// Assert
expect(result).toBe(100);
});
});
Run it: npm test → must fail with "cannot find function" or similar.
Green — Minimum Code to Pass
Write the minimum implementation:
function calculateDiscount(price: number, user: { tier: string }): number {
if (user.tier === 'premium') return price * 0.9;
return price;
}
Run it: npm test → must pass.
Refactor — Clean Up While Green
Now clean up the implementation:
const DISCOUNT_RATES: Record<string, number> = {
premium: 0.10,
};
function calculateDiscount(price: number, user: { tier: string }): number {
const discountRate = DISCOUNT_RATES[user.tier] ?? 0;
return price * (1 - discountRate);
}
Run it: npm test → must still pass.
Git Checkpoint
After each Red-Green-Refactor cycle:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 127 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 764ba2a9bbd2
tdd-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository DVNghiem/FlowDeck (42 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 778 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
tdd-workflow compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tdd-workflowDVNghiem/FlowDeck | Skill | 42 | today | MIT | A | 39 | Claude Code, Codex |
| sparc-methodologyspencermarx/open-code-review | Skill | 388 | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| sparc-methodologyshyftlabs/continuum | Skill | 84 | 1mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| sparc-methodologyamangit1314/repo-rag | Skill | 0 | 1mo ago | none | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| sparc-methodologyruvnet/RuView | Skill | 104k | today | MIT | A | 29 | Claude Code |
| linear-ticketsstablyai/orca | Skill | 125k | today | MIT | A | 85 | Claude Code, Codex |
| orca-jirastablyai/orca | Skill | 125k | today | MIT | A | 74 | Claude Code, Codex |