sanad-agent: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/sanad-pull-request-review/SKILL.md

Sanad Pull Request Review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from EastStarAI/sanad-agent. It costs 32 tokens per session (459 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A review procedure for checking a Sanad pull request against its related issue, plan, contracts, tests, security boundaries, and required labels.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to inspect the full diff, acceptance criteria, project instructions, tests, security implications, protected paths, and required checks. It reports findings but does not approve or merge the request.
Why use it?
It makes the review evidence-based and helps catch correctness, security, documentation, testing, dependency, and release problems before approval.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions AGENTS.md.

This is EastStarAI/sanad-agent's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on sanad-agent itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything sanad-agent configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to EastStarAI/sanad-agent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EastStarAI/sanad-agent/main/.agents/skills/sanad-pull-request-review/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EastStarAI/sanad-agent

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for Sanad Pull Request Review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for Sanad Pull Request Review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 459 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00032 $0.00459
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.00230
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00092
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00046

Measured 11d ago against content hash 1f150c541983, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Sanad Pull Request Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/sanad-pull-request-review/SKILL.md · 37 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 37 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Sanad Pull Request Review

Use this skill for evidence-first review. It reports findings but does not approve, merge, add protected labels, or perform another maintainer action without explicit authorization.

Review Procedure

  1. Read the linked Issue, accepted Discussion, or owning task plan and extract acceptance criteria.
  2. Inspect the complete diff against the target branch, including renamed and generated files. Confirm the branch has a common ancestor with main.
  3. Read the nearest AGENTS.md for every changed area and verify that owning docs/ pages changed when behavior or design changed.
  4. Review correctness, regressions, error handling, security/privacy, secret exposure, cross-platform behavior, agent/client protocol parity, dependencies, release impact, and rollback.
  5. Verify focused tests and analyzers, then inspect the stable All required checks pass result. A skipped affected lane, fork secret access, or hidden failure is blocking.
  6. Map paths to protected labels:
    • .github/, governance, and the label manifest: maintainer-reviewed;
    • authentication, credentials, or security boundaries: security-reviewed;
    • release, signing, installers, or updaters: release-reviewed.
  7. Confirm a user with triage/write authority supplied each required positive-review label. Never add one merely to make CI green.
  8. Review dependency and lockfile diffs explicitly.

Findings Format

Order findings by severity:

  • Blocker: unsafe, incorrect, acceptance-breaking, secret-exposing, or required evidence missing.
  • Warning: material risk or maintainability problem that should be resolved before merge.
  • Suggestion: non-blocking improvement.

Each finding includes a precise path/location, impact, evidence, and actionable correction. If no finding remains, state the residual risks and exact verification reviewed. Do not claim approval for a security-sensitive change solely because this skill produced no findings.

Mutation Boundary

Read the full file on GitHub · 37 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 37 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 1f150c541983

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Sanad Pull Request Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository EastStarAI/sanad-agent (44 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 459 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

code-review

Use when asked to review a PR, MR, branch, or diff, audit changed files, or check code quality.

evanca/flutter-ai-rules · 27 tokens

flutter-mcp-boundary-audit

Generic contract/schema boundary audit across authoring, discovery, validation, and execute—detecting split-brain between listings and invoke paths, gateway divergence, and permissive placeholders. Use when changing tool registration, RPC/plugin registries, dynamic tools, MCP or WebMCP surfaces, CLI exec aliases…

Arenukvern/mcp_flutter · 92 tokens

mine-plan-review

Strictly review one implemented repository plan against AGENTS.md, architecture, the immutable plan, implementation commits, real runtime behavior, verification evidence, and downstream contracts. Use when the user invokes the host-specific mine-plan-review skill with a plan path, asks whether a plan can be accepted…

6ixGODD/mine · 100 tokens

gh-address-comments

Help address review/issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI; verify gh auth first and prompt the user to authenticate if not logged in.

rojim666/SztuCode · 39 tokens

review-checklist

A structured checklist for reviewing work and bringing the review to a clear close. It covers preparing evidence, freezing the checklist, updating status, and resolving remaining items.

devcodex-labs/devcodex · 29 tokens

audit-tech-design

A review checklist for technical designs, covering architecture, technology choices, and the plan for implementing a system or feature.

devcodex-labs/devcodex · 33 tokens