Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to EastStarAI/sanad-agent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/EastStarAI/sanad-agent/main/.agents/skills/sanad-pull-request-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EastStarAI/sanad-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eaststarai/sanad-agent/sanad-pull-request-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00842 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00337 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00168 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
Sanad Pull Request Review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 46 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sanad Pull Request Review
Use this skill for evidence-first review. In the delegated Plan97 three-role workflow you are the independent reviewer: you run exclusively on provider ChatGPT with the exact model gpt-5.6-sol, and you fail closed — no substitute provider or model — when that model is unavailable. You review the change inside the isolation boundary and never claim an approval you cannot verify.
Review Procedure
- Read the linked Issue, accepted Discussion, or owning task plan and extract acceptance criteria.
- Inspect the complete diff against the target branch, including renamed and generated files. Confirm the branch has a common ancestor with
main. - Read the nearest
AGENTS.mdfor every changed area and verify that owningdocs/pages changed when behavior or design changed. - Review correctness, regressions, error handling, security/privacy, secret exposure, cross-platform behavior, agent/client protocol parity, dependencies, release impact, and rollback.
- Verify focused tests and analyzers, then inspect the stable
All required checks passresult. A skipped affected lane, fork secret access, or hidden failure is blocking. Use the boundedpr-checksmonitor (scripts/workflow_guards) instead of fragile shell parsing for long check waits. - Map paths to protected labels:
.github/, governance, and the label manifest:maintainer-reviewed;- authentication, credentials, or security boundaries:
security-reviewed; - release, signing, installers, or updaters:
release-reviewed.
- Confirm a user with triage/write authority supplied each required positive-review label, and that
protected-labels.ymlre-verified it for the current head SHA. Never add one merely to make CI green; a label applied or removed without that dispatch leaves the aggregate result stale. - Confirm the pull request also carries its mandatory non-protected labels: exactly one
type/*and at least onecomp/*, plusplatform/*only when the change is platform-specific and asize/*entry when the size is material. Apply or request the missing labels, and report an unlabeled or misclassified pull request as a finding instead of reviewing around it. A greenAll required checks passnever proves these labels exist, because the protected-label job checks protected labels only. - Review dependency and lockfile diffs explicitly.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed 4240013ce577
- 21d ago Changed · +1 lines 2df8e7260066
- 1mo ago Changed · +8 lines 8aeb3787f508
- 2mo ago First seen · 37 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 1f150c541983
Sanad Pull Request Review is a skill published in the GitHub repository EastStarAI/sanad-agent (47 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 842 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Sanad Pull Request Review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sanad Pull Request ReviewEastStarAI/sanad-agent | Skill | 47 | yesterday | MIT | A | 32 | Claude Code, Codex |
| code-reviewevanca/flutter-ai-rules | Skill | 669 | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| flutter-mcp-boundary-auditArenukvern/mcp_flutter | Skill | 395 | 20d ago | MIT | A | 92 | Claude Code |
| security-reviewsgaabdu4/building-flutter-apps | Skill | 25 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 58 | Claude Code, Codex |
| code-reviewsgaabdu4/building-flutter-apps | Skill | 25 | 4d ago | MIT | A | 39 | Claude Code, Codex |
| gitnexus-impact-analysisArenukvern/mcp_flutter | Skill | 395 | 20d ago | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| flutterpledgeandgrow/pledge-skills | Skill | 10 | 3mo ago | MIT | A | 126 | Claude Code, Codex |