Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin --skill academic-paper-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/echoleesong/claude-skills-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/academic-paper-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/academic-paper-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/academic-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin/academic-paper-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00104 | $0.05531 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00052 | $0.02766 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.01106 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00553 |
Grade A, and why
academic-paper-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to academic-paper-reviewer — 37 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 427 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Academic Paper Reviewer v1.10.0 — Multi-Perspective Academic Paper Review Agent Team
Simulates a complete international journal peer review process: automatically identifies the paper's field, dynamically configures 5 reviewers (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) who review from four non-overlapping perspectives — methodology, domain expertise, cross-disciplinary viewpoints, and core argument challenges — ultimately producing a structured Editorial Decision and Revision Roadmap.
v1.1 Improvements:
- Added Devil's Advocate Reviewer — specifically challenges core arguments, detects logical fallacies, and identifies the strongest counter-arguments
- Added
re-reviewmode — verification review, focused on checking whether revisions address the review comments - Expanded review team from 4 to 5 members
Routing discipline (v3.9.2): see
.claude/CLAUDE.md"Routing Discipline (v3.9.2)" +shared/references/intent_clarification_protocol.mdfor cross-skill routing rules. This skill assumes routing has already settled — ambiguous cross-phase materials should have been clarified upstream.
Quick Start
Simplest command:
Review this paper: [paste paper or provide file]
Output:
- Automatically identifies the paper's field and methodology type
- Dynamically configures the specific identities and expertise of 5 reviewers
- 5 independent review reports (each from a different perspective)
- 1 Editorial Decision Letter + Revision Roadmap
Trigger Conditions
Trigger Keywords
English: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy
Non-Trigger Scenarios
| Scenario | Skill to Use |
|---|---|
| Need to write a paper (not review) | academic-paper |
| Need in-depth investigation of a research topic | deep-research |
| Need to revise a paper (already have review comments) | academic-paper (revision mode) |
What ships with it
24 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/devils_advocate_reviewer_agent.md 17 KB
- agents/domain_reviewer_agent.md 13 KB
- agents/editorial_synthesizer_agent.md 14 KB
- agents/eic_agent.md 10 KB
- agents/field_analyst_agent.md 9.2 KB
- agents/methodology_reviewer_agent.md 14 KB
- agents/perspective_reviewer_agent.md 15 KB
- examples/hei_paper_review_example.md 26 KB
- examples/interdisciplinary_review_example.md 19 KB
- references/calibration_mode_protocol.md 10 KB
- references/changelog.md 976 B
- references/editorial_decision_standards.md 9.0 KB
- references/guided_mode_protocol.md 1.9 KB
- references/integration_guide.md 680 B
- references/quality_rubrics.md 7.5 KB
- references/re_review_mode_protocol.md 4.2 KB
- references/review_criteria_framework.md 9.9 KB
- references/review_quality_thinking.md 2.9 KB
- references/sprint_contract_protocol.md 11 KB
- references/statistical_reporting_standards.md 22 KB
- references/top_journals_by_field.md 13 KB
- templates/editorial_decision_template.md 6.3 KB
- templates/peer_review_report_template.md 7.3 KB
- templates/revision_response_template.md 6.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 427 lines · 104 tokens per session scan A 3dbb93d3e6bf
academic-paper-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository echoleesong/claude-skills-plugin (4 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 104 tokens to every session and 5,531 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to academic-paper-reviewer, differing in 37 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
instrument-data-to-allotrope
Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…
matlab
Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.
exploratory-data-analysis
Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…
phylogenetics
Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
mapping-to-snomed
Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…