Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/eddiebelaval/squirenpx agentmods add skills/eddiebelaval/squire/code-reviewerWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eddiebelaval/squire/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eddiebelaval/squire/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eddiebelaval/squire/code-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eddiebelaval/squire/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eddiebelaval/squire/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Privilege Escalation · line 146 Code accesses credential files (SSH keys, AWS credentials, etc.). This could indicate credential theft attempts.Fix: Remove references to credential paths. Use environment variables or secrets managers. For docs, use placeholder paths (e.g., /path/to/config). Never load .env or token files in production code paths.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.01068 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00534 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00214 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00107 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 230 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Reviewer
Core Workflows
Workflow 1: Primary Action
- Analyze the input and context
- Validate prerequisites are met
- Execute the core operation
- Verify the output meets expectations
- Report results
Complete toolkit for code reviewer with modern tools and best practices.
Quick Start
Main Capabilities
This skill provides three core capabilities through automated scripts:
# Script 1: Pr Analyzer
python scripts/pr_analyzer.py [options]
# Script 2: Code Quality Checker
python scripts/code_quality_checker.py [options]
# Script 3: Review Report Generator
python scripts/review_report_generator.py [options]
Core Capabilities
1. Pr Analyzer
Automated tool for pr analyzer tasks.
Features:
- Automated scaffolding
- Best practices built-in
- Configurable templates
- Quality checks
Usage:
python scripts/pr_analyzer.py <project-path> [options]
2. Code Quality Checker
Comprehensive analysis and optimization tool.
Features:
- Deep analysis
- Performance metrics
- Recommendations
- Automated fixes
Usage:
python scripts/code_quality_checker.py <target-path> [--verbose]
3. Review Report Generator
Advanced tooling for specialized tasks.
Features:
- Expert-level automation
- Custom configurations
- Integration ready
- Production-grade output
Usage:
python scripts/review_report_generator.py [arguments] [options]
Reference Documentation
Code Review Checklist
Comprehensive guide available in references/code_review_checklist.md:
- Detailed patterns and practices
- Code examples
- Best practices
- Anti-patterns to avoid
- Real-world scenarios
Coding Standards
Complete workflow documentation in references/coding_standards.md:
- Step-by-step processes
- Optimization strategies
- Tool integrations
- Performance tuning
- Troubleshooting guide
Common Antipatterns
Technical reference guide in references/common_antipatterns.md:
- Technology stack details
- Configuration examples
- Integration patterns
- Security considerations
- Scalability guidelines
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 230 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 1ffeb726fd4b
code-reviewer is a skill published in the GitHub repository eddiebelaval/squire (21 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,068 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
checkup-simplify
Use this skill when the user asks for conservative cleanup of already changed source files, similar to Claude Code /simplify, but the active agent may be Cursor, Codex, Gemini, or OpenCode.
crap-analyzer
Use to produce a risk-based refactor + test plan for recently-changed code on a diff/branch/PR by computing CRAP (complexity × untested) on changed methods. Multi-language — TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Java, Kotlin, Go, Ruby, C#, Rust, PHP — auto-discovers how the repo generates coverage. Triggers …
github-commenting
How to post clean, rich, deduplicated GitHub PR review comments — suggestion blocks, multi-line anchors, markers, formatting rules. Load before posting or fixing any PR comment.
ork-assess
Assess a code change, design, architecture, workflow, or competing options against explicit criteria and evidence. Use when a request asks to assess, rate, compare, identify trade-offs, evaluate readiness, or decide whether an approach is good enough. Do not use for a full pull-request review or to implement a chosen…
anti-monolith-guard
Prevent mixed-responsibility modules and uncontrolled file growth.
code-hygiene-refactor
Select a bounded, behavior-preserving code-hygiene batch.