Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Eilodon/DPS-Superskills-MCP --skill specialist-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Eilodon/DPS-Superskills-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eilodon/dps-superskills-mcp/specialist-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eilodon/dps-superskills-mcp/specialist-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eilodon/dps-superskills-mcp/specialist-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eilodon/dps-superskills-mcp/specialist-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eilodon/dps-superskills-mcp/specialist-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.04658 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.01863 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00932 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00466 |
Grade A, and why
specialist-review scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Sends data to an external URLlowData exfiltration
A POST to an outside endpoint may be telemetry or may be exfiltration; either way the mod talks to somewhere, and you should know where.
const response = await fetch("https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages", { method: "POST", Downgraded: this mod is about security review, or the phrase is quoted, so it is likely naming the pattern rather than instructing it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 474 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Specialist-Review — Context-Aware Code Review
Standalone context-aware code review with specialist lens routing. Core principle: Match the lens to the risk. Auth code → STRIDE. Async code → TEMPORAL.
When to Request Review
Mandatory: after each task in subagent-driven development, after major feature, before merge. Optional: when stuck, before refactoring, after complex bug fix.
Alternative Entry: Role-Based Dispatch
Nếu lens signals không rõ hoặc requester nghĩ theo roles thay vì technical lenses:
| "Tôi cần..." | Primary Lens | Key focus |
|---|---|---|
| Security architect review | STRIDE + OWASP | Trust boundaries, injection, auth lifecycle |
| Systems architect review | ATAM + CPT | Quality tradeoffs, write chains, scale assumptions |
| Async engineer review | TEMPORAL | Commit boundaries, idempotency, worker safety |
| Domain expert review | CONTEXT.md grounding | Vocabulary alignment, spec-to-code drift |
| Generic code review | No signal → generic | Spec compliance + code quality |
Role dispatch routes to the same VHEATM lenses — it's a UX alias, not a different methodology.
Step 1: Detect Signals
Scan the diff and changed file paths:
STRIDE triggers (auth / trust boundary):
imports: jwt, oauth2, session, bcrypt, crypto, hmac, passport, authlib, PyJWT
paths: auth/, middleware/, guard/, interceptor/, policy/
patterns: "token", "permission", "role", "scope", "principal", "authenticate"
OWASP triggers (user input / web surface):
imports: request, express, fastapi, flask, axios, fetch, httpx, aiohttp
patterns: user-controlled params entering DB queries, HTML rendering, file paths
paths: routes/, controllers/, api/, handlers/, views/
ATAM triggers (architecture decision):
files: docs/superskills/adrs/, docs/architecture/
patterns: "service", "gateway", "queue", "cache", "broker", "consensus"
scope: diff touches > 3 services or crosses module boundaries
TEMPORAL triggers (async / state / time):
imports: asyncio, celery, arq, dramatiq, threading, concurrent.futures,
SQLAlchemy (async), asyncpg, aioredis
patterns: "await", "async def", "background_task", "worker", "retry", "cron"
paths: workers/, jobs/, tasks/, background/, queues/
CPT triggers (write chain / interface boundary):
patterns: write chain ≥ 3 components (A → B → C with shared state)
signals: financial path, payment processing, data pipeline, audit trail
PRIVACY/SECRETS triggers (sensitive data / disclosure):
patterns: PII, secret, token, api_key, private_key, payment, regulated, telemetry, logging, prompt/tool payload, export, backup
paths: logging/, telemetry/, analytics/, ai/, prompts/, exports/, backups/, billing/, payments/
action: run `privacy-secrets-gate`; treat this as a release blocker if C4 or external disclosure is planned
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 474 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A a5d3654767f7
specialist-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Eilodon/DPS-Superskills-MCP (0 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 4,658 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (sends data to an external url). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Structured code review through the shared OpenClaw agent-skills installation.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…
omh-code-review
This is an OMH code-review workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
explore-unknowns
Guide the user through a quadrant walk that maps the unknowns of a task — open by listing the known knowns, then work through known unknowns, unknown knowns, and unknown unknowns one stage at a time, ending with a complete four-quadrant map in the user's hands. Use when a request is ambiguous or underspecified, the…
re0-merge
Review and land an external contribution the way this suite does: gate it against the thesis, land it with the author's credit intact, complete a new skill rather than merging it raw, then approve, credit, and explain before closing. Use when reviewing a pull request, as any collaborator or maintainer, not only the…