Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add elevanaltd/HestAI-MCP --skill infrastructure-integritygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/elevanaltd/HestAI-MCPWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/elevanaltd/hestai-mcp/infrastructure-integrity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/elevanaltd/hestai-mcp/infrastructure-integrity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/elevanaltd/hestai-mcp/infrastructure-integrity/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/elevanaltd/hestai-mcp/infrastructure-integrity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/elevanaltd/hestai-mcp/infrastructure-integrity.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00207 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00083 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
infrastructure-integrity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
===SKILL:INFRASTRUCTURE_INTEGRITY=== META: TYPE::SKILL VERSION::"1.0" PURPOSE::"Protocol for maintaining test infrastructure reliability and reproducibility"
§1::CORE_CONSTRAINTS CONSTRAINTS::[ CI_REPRODUCIBILITY::"Local test execution must match CI environment exactly", STANDARDS_OBSERVABILITY::"Violations must be detectable through automated quality gates", ENVIRONMENT_ISOLATION::"Test credentials must never touch production systems", CROSS_APP_CONSISTENCY::"Shared test patterns must work identically across workspace" ]
§2::ANTI_PATTERNS VIOLATIONS::[ VALIDATION_THEATER::"CI passes but tests don't actually run", CONFIGURATION_DRIFT::"Local works but CI fails due to environment differences", CREDENTIAL_EXPOSURE::"Test credentials leaked to git", STANDARDS_EROSION::"Test files scattered without naming consistency" ]
===END===
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2e5a7ed0fc32
infrastructure-integrity is a skill published in the GitHub repository elevanaltd/HestAI-MCP (0 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 207 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
Verification & Quality Assurance
Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.
quality-scan
Run a scoped, read-only quality scan and report exact-candidate evidence, failures and frozen debt. Use for an ad-hoc gate sweep or release preparation; a static scan is not full release acceptance.
e2e-testing
Use when reviewing CI coverage, automated checks, or test strategy related to Implement end-to-end testing. Focus on whether the rule is continuously verified, not just documented.
mirrord-prev-env
Help users create and manage mirrord preview environments — running a modified service as an isolated pod in a shared Kubernetes cluster, scoped by an environment key and HTTP/queue traffic filtering, so teams can validate and review changes against real traffic without affecting live services. Use when a developer…
test-setup
Scaffold the test framework and CI — tests/ directory, engine test runner, GitHub Actions workflow. Once, before the first sprint.
ci
Configure Ginkgo for continuous integration — the recommended CLI flag set and the rationale for each flag (-r -p --randomize-all --randomize-suites --fail-on-pending --fail-on-empty --keep-going --cover --race --trace --json-report --timeout --poll-progress-after/-interval), invoking via go run to pin the CLI to…