zen-review

zen-review is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from EliasOulkadi/shokunin. It costs 44 tokens per session (2,304 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review guide for examining pull-request changes for correctness, security, speed, and code quality.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a repository diff and return findings in JSON without changing files or running tests.
Why use it?
It helps spot problems in a proposed change before the code is merged.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions OpenCode.

Good fit Use it to review a repository diff and return findings in JSON without changing files or running tests.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add EliasOulkadi/shokunin --skill zen-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EliasOulkadi/shokunin

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for zen-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for zen-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 44 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,304 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • high System Prompt Leakage · line 108
    Skill contains instructions that could directly expose system prompts, internal rules, or hidden instructions to users or external parties.
    Fix: Remove any instructions that reveal, print, or output system prompts or internal rules. System instructions should never be exposed to end users.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00044 $0.02304
Opus 5.5 $0.00018 $0.00922
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00461
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00230

Measured 1mo ago against content hash add5303388cc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

zen-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.pack/skills/zen-review/SKILL.md · 164 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Code Review

You are an expert code reviewer with deep codebase understanding.

You are running inside the actual repository. Do NOT clone or fetch — the repo is already checked out. Do NOT run tests, builds, or modify any files. Do NOT read existing PR comments or reviews — form your own independent opinion from the code only.

Workflow

Your Task

  1. Get the diff of changes to review. Try these sources in order:
    • Diff file path: If the prompt provides a diff file path (e.g., /tmp/review-diff.patch), read the diff from that file.
    • Text diff in prompt: If the prompt contains a pasted diff (unified diff format), use it directly.
    • Git commit hashes: If the prompt provides commit hashes, extract the diff:
      # Single commit:
      git diff "<commit>^..<commit>"
      # Two commits or range (abc123..def456):
      git diff "<commit1>..<commit2>"
      
    • Current branch changes: If none of the above are provided, compute the diff from the current branch:
      MERGE_BASE=$(git merge-base HEAD origin/main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD origin/master 2>/dev/null)
      if [ -n "$MERGE_BASE" ]; then
        git diff "$MERGE_BASE" > /tmp/review-diff.patch
      else
        git diff HEAD > /tmp/review-diff.patch
      fi
      
      This captures the full current branch delta without appending a second working-tree diff, so the patch does not contain duplicated hunks. Read the resulting file. If it is empty, inform the user that no changes were found and stop.
  2. Process each changed file ONE BY ONE in the order they appear in the diff. For each file, complete ALL steps below before moving to the next file.

Review Method (per file)

1. Read the full file and analyze every changed line

  • Read the complete file to understand context.
  • For EVERY new or modified line, ask: is this correct?
  • Check function call arguments: do the types and order match the function signature? Read the called function's definition to verify.
  • Check conditions and comparisons: are they logically correct? Any off-by-one? Any wrong operators (AND vs OR, == vs ===)?
  • Check variable usage: is the right variable used? Could names be confused?
  • Check return values: does the caller handle all possible return values correctly?

Read the full file on GitHub · 164 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 164 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A add5303388cc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

zen-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository EliasOulkadi/shokunin (112 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 2,304 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

sast-businesslogic

Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations…

capture0x/YeepForge · 110 tokens

sast-graphql

Detect GraphQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (confirm GraphQL usage and find unsafe operation document assembly sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, up to 3 candidate sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires…

capture0x/YeepForge · 123 tokens

sast-idor

Detect Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find candidates), batched verify (check authorization in parallel subagents, 3 candidates each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Checks endpoints for missing ownership or authorization checks on…

capture0x/YeepForge · 103 tokens

sast-sqli

Detect SQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find unsafe SQL construction sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers string concat, f-strings, unsafe ORM methods, and dynamic…

capture0x/YeepForge · 104 tokens

sast-ssrf

Detect Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find outbound call sites), batched verify (trace user input to destinations in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first).…

capture0x/YeepForge · 99 tokens

migration-review

Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.

rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch · 35 tokens