Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add EliasOulkadi/shokunin --skill zen-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EliasOulkadi/shokuninWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/eliasoulkadi/shokunin/zen-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high System Prompt Leakage · line 108 Skill contains instructions that could directly expose system prompts, internal rules, or hidden instructions to users or external parties.Fix: Remove any instructions that reveal, print, or output system prompts or internal rules. System instructions should never be exposed to end users.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.02304 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00922 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00461 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00230 |
Grade A, and why
zen-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Review
You are an expert code reviewer with deep codebase understanding.
You are running inside the actual repository. Do NOT clone or fetch — the repo is already checked out. Do NOT run tests, builds, or modify any files. Do NOT read existing PR comments or reviews — form your own independent opinion from the code only.
Workflow
Your Task
- Get the diff of changes to review. Try these sources in order:
- Diff file path: If the prompt provides a diff file path (e.g.,
/tmp/review-diff.patch), read the diff from that file. - Text diff in prompt: If the prompt contains a pasted diff (unified diff format), use it directly.
- Git commit hashes: If the prompt provides commit hashes, extract the diff:
# Single commit: git diff "<commit>^..<commit>" # Two commits or range (abc123..def456): git diff "<commit1>..<commit2>" - Current branch changes: If none of the above are provided, compute the diff from the current branch:
This captures the full current branch delta without appending a second working-tree diff, so the patch does not contain duplicated hunks. Read the resulting file. If it is empty, inform the user that no changes were found and stop.MERGE_BASE=$(git merge-base HEAD origin/main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD origin/master 2>/dev/null) if [ -n "$MERGE_BASE" ]; then git diff "$MERGE_BASE" > /tmp/review-diff.patch else git diff HEAD > /tmp/review-diff.patch fi
- Diff file path: If the prompt provides a diff file path (e.g.,
- Process each changed file ONE BY ONE in the order they appear in the diff. For each file, complete ALL steps below before moving to the next file.
Review Method (per file)
1. Read the full file and analyze every changed line
- Read the complete file to understand context.
- For EVERY new or modified line, ask: is this correct?
- Check function call arguments: do the types and order match the function signature? Read the called function's definition to verify.
- Check conditions and comparisons: are they logically correct? Any off-by-one? Any wrong operators (AND vs OR, == vs ===)?
- Check variable usage: is the right variable used? Could names be confused?
- Check return values: does the caller handle all possible return values correctly?
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 164 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A add5303388cc
zen-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository EliasOulkadi/shokunin (112 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 2,304 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
sast-businesslogic
Detect business logic vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: threat modeling (domain analysis and attack scenarios), batched verify (check exploitable gaps in parallel subagents, 3 scenarios each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers price manipulation, workflow bypass, limit violations…
sast-graphql
Detect GraphQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (confirm GraphQL usage and find unsafe operation document assembly sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, up to 3 candidate sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires…
sast-idor
Detect Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find candidates), batched verify (check authorization in parallel subagents, 3 candidates each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Checks endpoints for missing ownership or authorization checks on…
sast-sqli
Detect SQL injection vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find unsafe SQL construction sites), batched verify (trace user input to those sites in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Covers string concat, f-strings, unsafe ORM methods, and dynamic…
sast-ssrf
Detect Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities in a codebase using a three-phase approach: recon (find outbound call sites), batched verify (trace user input to destinations in parallel subagents, 3 sites each), and merge (consolidate batch results). Requires sast/architecture.md (run sast-analysis first).…
migration-review
Review database migration files when a change adds or modifies paths under migrations/. Use it before merge to collect forward, rollback, locking, and data-safety evidence.