Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/emdash-cms/emdash/reviewnpx skills add emdash-cms/emdash --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/emdash-cms/emdashWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00057 | $0.02797 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.01399 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00559 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00280 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 102 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review a pull request
You are reviewing a pull request on emdash-cms/emdash. Find real bugs, regressions, and gaps, and return structured findings; the orchestrator posts them as a single review.
Review statically. Do not run the test suite, linter, builds, or install anything (you have no shell anyway). Read code, trace with searches, and reason. If confirming something would require running tooling, say it's unverified rather than guessing.
The repo's AGENTS.md is at the repo root in your context. Check the PR against its conventions (Lingui localization, RTL-safe Tailwind, SQL safety, API envelope shape, authorization, locale filtering on content tables, index discipline, changesets, query counts on logged-out routes, comment discipline). A violation is a real finding, not a nit.
Documentation changes
When the diff changes documentation prose, load the writing-emdash-docs skill before reviewing those files. This includes public docs, READMEs, contributor guidance, technical specifications, release notes and changesets, and skill instructions. Apply the skill only to documentation; do not spend review context on it for code, tests, generated files, or prose fixtures.
Verify documentation claims against the implementation, types, tests, command output, and adjacent docs. The writing skill does not replace technical investigation.
Calibrate documentation findings by their effect:
- Use
needs_fixingfor a false technical claim, an obsolete or unsafe command, an API example that cannot work, a procedure that cannot reach its stated outcome, a missing prerequisite that causes failure or data loss, or documentation that contradicts shipped behavior. - Use
suggestionfor voice, organization, accessibility, verbosity, or anti-slop edits that preserve meaning. - Do not flag a watched word or sentence shape by itself. Confirm that it makes the documentation less precise, less useful, or harder to understand.
When code changes user-visible behavior, check whether existing documentation becomes false or incomplete. Do not require public documentation for internal changes that do not alter how readers use EmDash.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 102 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 68b68d80098d
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository emdash-cms/emdash (12,159 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,797 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
wordpress-plugin-to-emdash
Port a WordPress plugin to EmDash CMS. Use this skill when asked to migrate, convert, or port a WordPress plugin, theme functionality, or custom post type to EmDash. Provides concept mapping and implementation patterns.
emdash-cli
Use the EmDash CLI to manage content, schema, media, and more. Use this skill when you need to interact with a running EmDash instance from the command line — creating content, managing collections, uploading media, generating types, or scripting CMS operations.
building-emdash-site
Build and customize EmDash CMS sites on Astro. Use when creating pages, defining collections, writing seed files, querying content, rendering Portable Text, setting up menus/taxonomies/widgets, configuring deployment, or any task involving an EmDash-powered Astro site. Assumes basic Astro knowledge but provides all…
emdash-github-actions
Sets up GitHub Actions CI/CD workflows for EmDash plugins — TypeScript type-checking, ESLint linting, Vitest testing, npm publishing, and automated releases. ALWAYS use this skill when a user wants to create, add, set up, or configure GitHub Actions, CI/CD, automated checks, or deployment workflows for an EmDash…
adversarial-reviewer
Adversarial code review that assumes bugs exist and hunts for them. Use when asked to review code, find bugs, audit for correctness, stress-test a PR, or when someone says "tear this apart" or "what's wrong with this". Give no benefit of the doubt — every line is guilty until proven innocent.
agent-browser
Browser automation for testing and verification. Use when you need to interact with web UIs, verify visual changes, fill forms, or capture screenshots.