Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add emiliosheinz/agent-skills --skill prgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/emiliosheinz/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/emiliosheinz/agent-skills/pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/emiliosheinz/agent-skills/pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/emiliosheinz/agent-skills/pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/emiliosheinz/agent-skills/pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/emiliosheinz/agent-skills/pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00132 | $0.00537 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00053 | $0.00215 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00107 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
PR
One verb per invocation.
Verbs
open is the only verb: commit, push, and open a draft PR with a written body.
Procedure: references/open.md.
No verb given, and the branch has commits the base does not: assume open. A
PR already exists for the branch: stop, give its URL, and say open never
updates an existing PR. Do not infer a verb absent from this file.
The two tests
Every body this skill writes passes both. They are the whole quality bar; there is no word count and no mandatory section.
- A reviewer scans it in under 60 seconds. Not reads — scans.
- The body is never more complex than the fix. A one-line dependency bump cannot earn three paragraphs.
Test 2 is decided from the diff before drafting, and test 1 is re-checked against the draft. Both procedures are in references/writing-the-body.md.
Writing the body
Load references/writing-the-body.md before writing any body. There is no template: sections are not mandatory, not fixed in order, and not named in advance. A change that needs one sentence gets one sentence.
Credits
Framing adapted from Dex Horthy's visual-pr; views come from this repo's
show-me. See CREDITS.md.
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 58 lines · 132 tokens per session scan A 5fc61c210c79
pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository emiliosheinz/agent-skills (19 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 132 tokens to every session and 537 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-12.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-implement-phase
Implements triaged review actions, commits focused fixes, and posts Done plus resolves threads. Use when the user wants only the implementation phase of the review-framework workflow.
github-pr-workflow
Prepare a GitHub pull request from a feature branch — branch hygiene, commit shape, title/body, verification notes, screenshots for UI work, and replies to review comments.
review-delta
Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.
work-unit-commits
Plan commits as reviewable work units. Trigger: implementation, commit splitting, chained PRs, or keeping tests and docs with code.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
git-pr-workflows-git-workflow
Guide changes through code checks, testing, commits, and pull request preparation. Use when coordinating a complete Git workflow and verifying readiness for collaboration.