Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit --skill docs-project-managementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit/docs-project-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit/docs-project-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit/docs-project-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit/docs-project-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit/docs-project-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00319 | $0.03201 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00128 | $0.01280 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00064 | $0.00640 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00032 | $0.00320 |
Grade A, and why
docs-project-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TASKLANG TYPE SKILL
IDENTITY "Docs Project Management (the docs/-native system of record)"
A universal, reusable playbook for running a whole project — requirements, planning, build tracking, testing, bugs, and team reporting — as committed markdown inside the repo's
docs/folder. It works in ANY project, in any stack, from day one of a NEW project: no external issue tracker, no ticket system, no proprietary tooling. A work item is a markdown file with YAML frontmatter; a relationship is a relative markdown link; a status change is a frontmatter edit; the full history is git.It does three jobs:
- WORK-ITEM MODEL — WHAT document types exist (PRD, TRD, Epic, User Story, Test Case, Bug, Roadmap), WHERE each lives, HOW they link, and HOW status is tracked.
- TEAM WORK-REPORTING — HOW every agent/contributor reports its work so anyone can see, in one committed place, everything that was done (who, what, when, with which evidence).
- DURABLE vs TEMPORARY — WHAT belongs in committed
docs/versus the git-ignored.ai_log/temp-evidence folder, and when to promote content from one to the other.
§1 Document types — WHAT the system manages
Every work item is a committed markdown file in its
docs/subfolder: descriptive kebab-case filename (never an opaque ID), YAML frontmatter for status/metadata, relative-markdown links for relationships. Full field-level detail: [[work-item-taxonomy]].
TABLE document-types
COLUMNS: Type, Lives in, What it is / holds
ROW: Project brief | docs/project_brief.md | The product spec — the SOURCE OF TRUTH the whole project derives from; wins over any assumption
ROW: Project config| docs/project_config/info.md | The single home for project-specific FACTS (product name, app name, stack, domain, scope, success scenarios) — agents read it instead of hard-coding facts
ROW: Roadmap | docs/ROADMAP.md + docs/roadmap.json | The milestone/release plan (human file) + a machine-readable MIRROR of every work item's current status (JSON cache, regenerated from docs/, committed)
ROW: PRD | docs/prd/ | Product Requirements Document — WHAT to build and WHY: objectives, in-scope / out-of-scope, testable acceptance criteria per success scenario
ROW: TRD | docs/trd/ | Technical Requirements Document — HOW to build it: architecture, data model, migrations, jobs, authz. Canonical TRD home; keep index.json (machine registry, one entry per TRD) + index.md (human index) beside the files
ROW: Epic | docs/epics/ | A large feature/theme grouping related User Stories; carries goal + scope + its story list
ROW: User Story | docs/user_stories/ | The smallest shippable requirement — "as a I want " + numbered acceptance criteria; filename NNN-<kebab-title>.md
ROW: Test Case | docs/test_cases/ | A verification script for ONE behavior — numbered navigate→action→expected steps; filename tc-NNN-<kebab-behavior>.md; MUST follow the [[test-case-template]] and link its story "is tested by"
ROW: Bug | docs/bugs/ | A defect AND its Root-Cause-Analysis in ONE file — Symptom/Reproduction + 5-Whys RCA + Preventative Action at detection; Fix/diff/Resolved sections completed by whoever fixes it ([[bug-rca-report]]); blocks its story
ROW: Session report| docs/sessions/-/ | Per-run team work folder — a README manifest + one bookended report per agent/phase ([[session-reporting]])
ROW: Feature log | docs/reports/feature-log.md + feature-log/ | The team work-log split by feature: one lean index row per feature, linking a per-feature file where each run appends a row
RULES
- Filenames: descriptive kebab-case, never opaque IDs. External refs (ticket numbers), when they
exist, go in frontmatter + the title line — not the filename.
- Each subfolder may carry a template_<type>.md seed; new items copy its shape.
- Only APPROVED/final content advances status; drafts stay in their lifecycle state.
What ships with it
12 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- maps/index.json 3.9 KB
- maps/links.json 682 B
- maps/manifest.json 302 B
- maps/tags.json 636 B
- README.md 1.6 KB
- references/bug-rca-report.md 5.6 KB
- references/conventions-recap.md 2.3 KB
- references/link-graph.md 2.1 KB
- references/session-reporting.md 8.1 KB
- references/status-lifecycle.md 2.7 KB
- references/test-case-template.md 1.8 KB
- references/work-item-taxonomy.md 2.9 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 184 lines · 319 tokens per session scan A 4487c8c195db
docs-project-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository endorphin-ai/hasbrains-agent-kit (9 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 319 tokens to every session and 3,201 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
ralph-prd
Create Product Requirements Document (PRD) and setup for Ralph autonomous loop. Use when user runs /create-prd command, wants to set up a project for Ralph, mentions "ralph setup", "create prd", "product requirements", or needs to generate tasks for autonomous development.
roadmap
Synthesize project documentation and codebase into comprehensive roadmap status, gaps analysis, and blockers. Use when assessing project health, identifying blockers, tracking progress, comparing plan vs reality, documenting risks, or planning next milestones. Triggers: "roadmap", "project status", "blockers"…
pm
Analyze features from user perspective and write user stories with acceptance criteria. Use when defining requirements, writing user stories, validating scope against project state, prioritizing features by impact, comparing approaches, analyzing user needs, or planning next work. Triggers: "user story", "acceptance…
ship-task
Use to wrap up a finished task - set status to done, merge, clean up.
impl-task
Use to implement a task by executing its implementation plan. Typical workflow: create-task → clarify-task → plan-task → impl-task → review-code → review-task → ship-task.
dev-finish
Close out a session — summarise what changed, capture what was learned, and prepare the commit.