Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/entropy-cloud/attractor-guided-engineering-template/mission-drivernpx skills add entropy-cloud/attractor-guided-engineering-template --skill mission-drivergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/entropy-cloud/attractor-guided-engineering-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/entropy-cloud/attractor-guided-engineering-template/mission-driver)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/entropy-cloud/attractor-guided-engineering-template/mission-driver"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/entropy-cloud/attractor-guided-engineering-template/mission-driver.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00199 | $0.05347 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00100 | $0.02674 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00040 | $0.01069 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00535 |
Grade A, and why
mission-driver scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 420 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
mission-driver — Roadmap creation and mission execution
This skill operates the tools/mission-driver/ engine shipped with this repo. It is
stack-agnostic: it works for Node, Python, Java, Go, or any project whose
verification commands can be expressed as shell strings. Project-specific values
(test command, module layout, commit format) are read from missions/base.json,
docs/context/project-context.md, and AGENTS.md rather than hardcoded here.
Companion docs (read on demand, not all at once):
tools/mission-driver/docs/user-manual.zh.md/user-manual.en.md— full training handbooktools/mission-driver/README.md— command cheat-sheettools/mission-driver/EXECUTION-PRINCIPLE.md— internal execution deep divetools/mission-driver/TROUBLESHOOTING.md— diagnostics when stuckdocs/plans/00-plan-authoring-and-execution-guide.md— plan format and lifecyclereferences/mission-config-schema.md— full mission.json schema (companion to this file)references/roadmap-template.md— roadmap structure with annotated example
Mental model
A mission = a fixed config (missions/<name>.json) for one development goal. The
engine reads it and enters a loop:
CHECK (health: tests/build pass)
→ REVIEW_PLANS (review draft plans → promote active; empty forEach = passthrough)
→ EXEC_PLANS (one plan-execution subflow per active plan:
EXECUTE → CLOSURE_SCRIPT_CHECK → CLOSURE_AUDIT → BUILD_VERIFY)
→ DRAFT_PLANS (draft 1-3 plans from roadmap → sub-agent review → promote active)
→ [loop back to REVIEW_PLANS]
→ nothing to draft → DEEP_AUDIT (multi-audit + open-audit → draft remediation plans)
→ REVIEW_PLANS (execute audit-created plans)
→ ... until maxAuditRounds exhausted and nothing outstanding
Key facts:
- Roadmap precedes mission. The
draftcommand will generate both roadmap andmissions/<name>.jsonfrom a single description, but only after the brief stage confirms scope is clear. missions/<name>.jsonis pure static config — no runtime state. The engine's runtime state lives in_tmp/<runDir>/run-state.json.- Every AI step is a child
opencode runprocess; logs land in_tmp/<ts>-mission-driver/. - Plan lifecycle:
draft→ (REVIEW_PLANS) →active→ (EXEC_PLANS) →completed. Subflowplan-executionruns once per active plan. - Ctrl-C / SIGTERM is caught by
main.jsfor graceful process-tree cleanup. - Plan format is a fixed contract enforced by
tools/mission-driver/src/plan-check.mjs.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 420 lines · 199 tokens per session scan A 554af2d42510
mission-driver is a skill published in the GitHub repository entropy-cloud/attractor-guided-engineering-template (74 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 199 tokens to every session and 5,347 once invoked, about $0.0010 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
om-auto-continue-pr
Resume any open PR — started by om-auto-create-pr or opened outside the pipeline. Claims it, resumes in an isolated worktree from the first unchecked step of its execution plan; a PR with no plan is adopted — the goal is reconstructed from its description, comments, review feedback, linked issues and diff, then…
om-auto-fix-issue
Fix or implement a tracker issue end to end from a single command — takes an issue id or a plain problem description (filed first via om-prepare-issue), classifies, then drives the bug autofix chain (om-verify-in-repo, om-root-cause, om-fix, om-open-pr, om-auto-review-pr, om-auto-qa-pr for UI fixes) or the feature…
om-spec-writing
Write and review feature specifications to staff-engineer standards. Skeleton-first drafting with a hard Open Questions gate, research against market leaders, an implementation breakdown into phases and steps that feeds om-auto-create-pr, and a severity-ranked architectural review format. Use when starting a new spec…
om-fix
Implements the minimal code change identified by the om-root-cause step, adds regression tests, and runs the configured validation gate. Claims the tracker issue at start (assignee + in-progress label + claim comment) so concurrent automation backs off. Does not commit, push, or open a PR — that is the om-open-pr…
om-merge-buddy
Scan open pull requests via the configured tracker, classify merge readiness from labels, reviews, CI, and mergeability, then report which PRs can merge now and which ones are close but blocked.
om-auto-manage-issues
Bring existing tracker issues up to standard without implementing anything — applies missing SDLC labels, clarifies laconic issues (analyzing attached screenshots), posts a read-only implementation-prep analysis, checks each issue against SDLC.md's Definition of Ready (READYSTATUS, not-ready comment), and flags…