Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add equinor/neqsim-community-skills --skill neqsim-safety-function-coverage-screeninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/equinor/neqsim-community-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-safety-function-coverage-screening)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-safety-function-coverage-screening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-safety-function-coverage-screening/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-safety-function-coverage-screening"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-safety-function-coverage-screening.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00082 | $0.01109 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00033 | $0.00444 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
neqsim-safety-function-coverage-screening scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Safety Function Coverage Screening
Use this skill for public, educational safety-function coverage screening. It checks whether a process component declares the protective functions that API RP 14C and ISO 10418 typically associate with that component type, reports the missing functions, and gives a coverage ratio so an agent can flag gaps before a formal Safety Analysis Function Evaluation (SAFE) chart review.
When to Use
- When a user asks whether a vessel or component has the usual API RP 14C protective functions.
- When an agent needs a quick protective-function gap check to scope a safety review.
- When examples must run without confidential SAFE charts, cause-and-effect matrices, or company safety specs.
Inputs
component_type: one ofpressure_vessel,separator,gas_pipeline_segment,liquid_pipeline_segment,fired_heater,compressor,pump, orwellhead.provided_functions: a collection of declared protective-function codes (for examplePSH,PSL,PSV,LSH,LSL,TSH,FSV,BSDV).
Outputs
component_type: the normalized component type.required_functions: the typically required protective-function codes for that type.provided_functions: the normalized declared functions.missing_functions: required functions that were not declared.coverage_ratio: fraction of required functions that are declared.coverage_warning:ok,watch, orgap.assumptions: public assumptions used by the placeholder model.
Engineering Method
The Python class SafetyFunctionCoverageModel uses the open API RP 14C / ISO 10418 concept only:
- each component type maps to a public set of typically required protective functions.
- the provided functions are compared to the required set to find missing functions.
- the coverage ratio is the count of provided required functions divided by the required count.
- the warning is a simple rule-based label that flags gaps for a formal review.
This is educational and screening-only logic. The required-function sets are simplified public defaults, not a project SAFE chart. It does not perform an undesirable-event analysis, evaluate detectable abnormal conditions, credit alternate protection, or assess independence and reliability. It is not a replacement for a formal API RP 14C / ISO 10418 SAFE-chart analysis and a qualified safety review.
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/basic_safety_function_coverage_screening.py 871 B runs code
- pyproject.toml 566 B
- README.md 1.1 KB
- src/safety_function_coverage_screening/__init__.py 152 B runs code
- src/safety_function_coverage_screening/model.py 3.8 KB runs code
- tests/test_safety_function_coverage_model.py 1.3 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 101 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A a7c424a6065d
neqsim-safety-function-coverage-screening is a skill published in the GitHub repository equinor/neqsim-community-skills (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,109 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-19.
neqsim-safety-function-coverage-screening compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| neqsim-safety-function-coverage-screeningequinor/neqsim-community-skills | Skill | 4 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 82 | Claude Code, Codex |
| instrument-data-to-allotropeanthropics/knowledge-work-plugins | Skill | 35k | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 123 | Claude Code |
| exploratory-data-analysisK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 83 | Claude Code |
| matlabK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 44 | Claude Code |
| phylogeneticsK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 71 | Claude Code, Codex |
| research-engineerdavila7/claude-code-templates | Skill | 33k | yesterday | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code, Codex |
| mapping-to-snomedmaziyarpanahi/openmed | Skill | 5.8k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 205 | Claude Code |