Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add equinor/neqsim-community-skills --skill neqsim-technology-assessment-reportgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/equinor/neqsim-community-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-technology-assessment-report)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-technology-assessment-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-technology-assessment-report/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-technology-assessment-report"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/equinor/neqsim-community-skills/neqsim-technology-assessment-report.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.01539 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00616 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00308 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00154 |
Grade A, and why
neqsim-technology-assessment-report scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 161 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Technology Assessment Report
Use this skill to write the technology assessment report that a project
study delivers for a technology it may use. The report is generated from the
structured results of neqsim-technology-assessment and
neqsim-technology-fmirr, plus author-written narrative. It checks the inputs
and lists every open point instead of hiding it.
When to Use
- A concept or project study needs a technology assessment report for a new or step-out technology.
- An assessment and FMIRR exist as data and must become a reviewable Word or Markdown document.
- A report is updated after new evidence changes ratings (re-run, compare the issues list, issue a new revision).
Inputs
assessment: atechnology_assessment.v1mapping (required).fmirr: atechnology_fmirr.v1mapping (recommended whenever any element needs qualification).ReportMeta: title, subtitle, document number, revision, author, reviewer, date, classification, status, project.narrative: author-written paragraphs per chapter id, appended to the generated text.introduction_context: why the project considers this technology.references: project documents, test reports and standards to add.
Outputs
- A
Reportwith chapters, tables and anissueslist. to_markdown()/save_markdown(path): Markdown with numbered tables.save_docx(path): Word document with title block, contents field, header and footer (classification, status, page numbers), landscape FMIRR chapter and risk-coloured cells (needspython-docx).to_dict(): JSON view for downstream tools.
Engineering Method
The report has fixed chapters so that reviewers always find the same content:
- Executive summary (generated from results).
- Introduction (purpose, scope, method, context).
- Technology qualification basis (description, use, environment, functions, performance expectations, regulatory requirements). Keep this chapter stable; it is reused in the qualification programme and qualification report.
- Technology description and decomposition.
- Technology maturity: novelty category and TRL per element and for the system.
- Enabling or enhancing technology.
- Step-out from existing experience (design, manufacturing, installation, operability, fluids, operating conditions, lifetime).
- Benefits and risks.
- Standardisation and multi-implementation.
- FMIRR, first version (landscape).
- Preliminary outline of qualification activities, linked to critical modes.
- Conclusions and recommendations.
- Assumptions, data gaps and open points.
- References.
- Appendix A: definitions (novelty table, TRL scale, consequence and probability classes).
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 161 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A a66c94d17eea
neqsim-technology-assessment-report is a skill published in the GitHub repository equinor/neqsim-community-skills (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 1,539 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-28.
neqsim-technology-assessment-report compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| neqsim-technology-assessment-reportequinor/neqsim-community-skills | Skill | 4 | today | Apache-2.0 | A | 99 | Claude Code, Codex |
| pydicomK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code, Codex |
| nature-paper2wordYuan1z0825/nature-skills | Skill | 52k | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 233 | Codex |
| pptx-postersK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills | Skill | 56k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 59 | Claude Code |
| nature-paper-transYuan1z0825/nature-skills | Skill | 52k | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 68 | Codex |
| extracting-lab-tablesmaziyarpanahi/openmed | Skill | 5.8k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 210 | Claude Code |
| paper-compilewanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep | Skill | 19k | 3d ago | MIT | B | 53 | Claude Code |