Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add equinor/neqsim --skill design-reactor-benchmarkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/equinor/neqsimWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim/design-reactor-benchmark)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim/design-reactor-benchmark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/equinor/neqsim/design-reactor-benchmark/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim/design-reactor-benchmark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/equinor/neqsim/design-reactor-benchmark.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.02457 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00983 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00491 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00246 |
Grade A, and why
design-reactor-benchmark scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to design_reactor_benchmark — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 249 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: Design Reactor / Chemical Equilibrium Benchmark
Purpose
Create a structured test matrix for evaluating Gibbs energy minimization solvers across reaction systems, conditions, and difficulty levels.
When to Use
- Starting a paper on chemical equilibrium algorithms (Gibbs reactor)
- Benchmarking Jacobian formulations or solver improvements
- Comparing Gibbs minimization against reference solutions (JANAF/NASA CEA)
- Evaluating convergence for reactive systems with trace species
Benchmark Design Procedure
Step 1: Select Reaction Systems
Choose test systems that span different thermochemical challenges:
| System | Feed Components | Key Products | Nc | Challenge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claus (direct) | H2S, O2, N2 | H2O, S8, SO2 | 5+ | Sulfur precipitation, trace species |
| Claus (two-stage) | H2S, O2 → SO2; then H2S + SO2 | S, H2O | 5+ | Multi-reactor, intermediate species |
| Methane combustion | CH4, O2, N2 | CO2, H2O, CO, NO | 7+ | High temperature, many products |
| Steam methane reforming | CH4, H2O | CO, H2, CO2 | 5 | Endothermic, equilibrium-limited |
| Water-gas shift | CO, H2O | CO2, H2 | 4 | Temperature-sensitive equilibrium |
| Ammonia synthesis | N2, H2 | NH3 | 3 | High pressure, sparse products |
| CO2 hydrogenation | CO2, H2 | CH3OH, H2O, CO | 5 | Catalyst-dependent selectivity |
| Iron sulfide corrosion | Fe, H2S | FeS, H2 | 4 | Solid product formation |
| Sour gas sweetening | H2S, CO2, CH4, MEA | Various | 8+ | Acid gas + amine chemistry |
Step 2: Define Condition Sweeps
For each system, define the parameter space:
import numpy as np
def generate_reactor_conditions(system):
"""Generate test conditions for a reaction system."""
cases = []
# Temperature sweep (most important for equilibrium)
T_values = np.linspace(system["T_min_K"], system["T_max_K"], system["n_T"])
# Pressure sweep
P_values = np.logspace(
np.log10(system["P_min_bara"]),
np.log10(system["P_max_bara"]),
system["n_P"]
)
# Feed composition perturbations
for T in T_values:
for P in P_values:
# Stoichiometric feed
cases.append({"T_K": float(T), "P_bara": float(P),
"feed": system["stoichiometric_feed"],
"label": "stoichiometric"})
# Excess reactant A
cases.append({"T_K": float(T), "P_bara": float(P),
"feed": system["excess_A_feed"],
"label": "excess_A"})
# Excess reactant B
cases.append({"T_K": float(T), "P_bara": float(P),
"feed": system["excess_B_feed"],
"label": "excess_B"})
return cases
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago First seen · 249 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A dae0d3bd9f52
design-reactor-benchmark is a skill published in the GitHub repository equinor/neqsim (156 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 2,457 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to design_reactor_benchmark, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…