Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add equinor/neqsim --skill write-methods-sectiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/equinor/neqsimWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim/write-methods-section)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim/write-methods-section"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/equinor/neqsim/write-methods-section/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/equinor/neqsim/write-methods-section"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/equinor/neqsim/write-methods-section.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.01983 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00793 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00397 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
write-methods-section scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to write_methods_section — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 249 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: Write Methods Section
Purpose
Draft a publication-quality Methods section for a computational thermodynamics paper. Includes mathematical notation, algorithm pseudocode, and benchmark design description.
When to Use
- Drafting the Methods section of a flash algorithm paper
- Documenting algorithmic changes for peer review
- Writing supplementary material with implementation details
Methods Section Structure
A good Methods section for a flash algorithm paper has these subsections:
1. Thermodynamic Framework
State the phase equilibrium conditions:
## 2. Methods
### 2.1 Phase Equilibrium Conditions
At thermodynamic equilibrium, the fugacity of each component $i$ must be equal
across all phases:
$$f_i^V(T, P, \mathbf{y}) = f_i^L(T, P, \mathbf{x}) \quad \forall i = 1, \ldots, N_c$$
where $f_i^V$ and $f_i^L$ are the fugacities of component $i$ in the vapor and
liquid phases, $\mathbf{y}$ and $\mathbf{x}$ are the vapor and liquid mole
fraction vectors, and $N_c$ is the number of components.
The equilibrium ratio (K-value) is defined as:
$$K_i = \frac{y_i}{x_i} = \frac{\hat{\phi}_i^L(T, P, \mathbf{x})}{\hat{\phi}_i^V(T, P, \mathbf{y})}$$
where $\hat{\phi}_i$ denotes the fugacity coefficient.
2. Equation of State
Describe the EOS used:
### 2.2 Equation of State
Calculations in this work use the Soave-Redlich-Kwong (SRK) equation of state
\cite{Soave1972}:
$$P = \frac{RT}{V - b} - \frac{a(T)}{V(V + b)}$$
with classical van der Waals mixing rules:
$$a = \sum_i \sum_j x_i x_j (a_i a_j)^{1/2} (1 - k_{ij})$$
$$b = \sum_i x_i b_i$$
where $k_{ij}$ are binary interaction parameters.
3. Baseline Algorithm
Describe the algorithm being compared against:
### 2.3 Baseline TP Flash Algorithm
The baseline implementation follows the classical two-stage approach
\cite{Michelsen1982a, Michelsen1982b}:
**Stage 1: Successive Substitution (SS)**
Starting from Wilson K-value estimates:
$$K_i^{(0)} = \frac{P_{c,i}}{P} \exp\left[5.373(1 + \omega_i)\left(1 - \frac{T_{c,i}}{T}\right)\right]$$
the phase fraction $\beta$ is obtained from the Rachford-Rice equation:
$$g(\beta) = \sum_{i=1}^{N_c} \frac{z_i(K_i - 1)}{1 + \beta(K_i - 1)} = 0$$
K-values are updated by:
$$K_i^{(n+1)} = K_i^{(n)} \frac{\hat{\phi}_i^L(\mathbf{x}^{(n)})}{\hat{\phi}_i^V(\mathbf{y}^{(n)})}$$
This is repeated until convergence or a maximum of $N_{SS}$ iterations.
**Stage 2: Newton-Raphson (NR)**
If SS has not converged, the algorithm switches to Newton-Raphson using
Michelsen's u-variable formulation \cite{Michelsen1982b}:
$$u_i = \beta \cdot y_i$$
The residual vector is:
$$r_i = \ln \hat{\phi}_i^V(\mathbf{y}) - \ln \hat{\phi}_i^L(\mathbf{x})$$
and the Jacobian:
$$J_{ij} = \frac{\partial r_i}{\partial u_j}$$
The update is:
$$\mathbf{u}^{(n+1)} = \mathbf{u}^{(n)} - \alpha \mathbf{J}^{-1} \mathbf{r}$$
where $\alpha$ is a line search parameter (Armijo backtracking).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago First seen · 249 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 2078518e2057
write-methods-section is a skill published in the GitHub repository equinor/neqsim (156 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,983 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to write_methods_section, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…