A pull-request review workflow that asks separate reviewers to inspect code, tests, errors, types, comments, and simplification, then combines their findings. A pull request is a proposed set of code changes for review.

Reviewing a pull request or local changes, selecting specific review areas, comparing against a base branch, and collecting the resulting reports.

It divides a review into focused checks and produces one prioritized report instead of relying on a single pass.

review-pr — Skill for Claude Code by ericboehs/claude-plugins

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent

npx skills add ericboehs/claude-plugins --skill review-pr

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ericboehs/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install pr-review, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/review-pr/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/review-pr)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ericboehs/claude-plugins/review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 65 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.

When invoked 761 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00065	$0.00761
Opus 5.5	$0.00026	$0.00304
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00013	$0.00152
Haiku 4.5	$0.00006	$0.00076

Measured 2mo ago against content hash bac349899d97, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/fan-out.sh), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/pr-review/skills/review-pr/SKILL.md · 79 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 79 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

PR Review

Fan out specialized reviewers as concurrent isolated pi subprocesses, then aggregate their reports. Reviewer prompts and the diff never enter your context — only the finished reports do.

Run it

plugins/pr-review/skills/review-pr/scripts/fan-out.sh

Use the absolute path to the script in this skill's directory. It prints progress to stderr and the output directory path to stdout.

Invocation	Behavior
`fan-out.sh`	Auto-detects applicable aspects from the diff
`fan-out.sh all`	Runs all six reviewers
`fan-out.sh tests errors`	Runs only those reviewers
`fan-out.sh --base main`	Reviews `main...HEAD`
`fan-out.sh --model <m>`	Overrides the model for children

Aspects: code (always), tests, errors, types, comments, simplify.

simplify is a polish pass — it only runs when explicitly requested or via all.

Diff range resolution

--base REF → REF...HEAD
else uncommitted changes exist → git diff HEAD
else → origin/<default-branch>...HEAD

Then aggregate

Read each <outdir>/<aspect>.md, then produce a single report. Do not dump the raw reports back to the user.

Merge duplicate findings reported by multiple reviewers into one entry, attributing each to its source. Preserve every file:line citation.

# PR Review Summary

_Reviewed N files across <range> with: <aspects>_

## Critical Issues (N)
- **[aspect]** Description — `file:line`

## Important Issues (N)
- **[aspect]** Description — `file:line`

## Suggestions (N)
- **[aspect]** Description — `file:line`

## Strengths
- What's genuinely well done

## Recommended Action
1. Fix critical issues first
2. Address important issues
3. Consider suggestions
4. Re-run affected reviewers to verify

Severity mapping: code confidence 90-100 and errors CRITICAL → Critical. code 80-89, errors HIGH, tests 8-10 → Important. Everything else → Suggestions.

If a reviewer reports nothing, note it in one line rather than omitting it.

Read the full file on GitHub · 79 lines

Files

What ships with it

7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

2mo ago First seen · 79 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A bac349899d97

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository ericboehs/claude-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 761 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Code review

review-pr next to 6 skills from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
review-prericboehs/claude-plugins	Skill	2	2mo ago	MIT	A	65	Claude Code
autoreviewopenclaw/clawhub	Skill	9.5k	today	MIT	A	17	Claude Code, Codex
omh-code-reviewrlaope/oh-my-hermes	Skill	5.2k	today	MIT	A	48	Claude Code, Codex
agent-teams-simplify-and-hardenLeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills	Skill	2.2k	6d ago	MIT	A	115	Claude Code, Codex
revdiff-planumputun/revdiff	Skill	947	2d ago	MIT	A	84	Claude Code
explore-unknownsdzhng/skills	Skill	1.4k	today	MIT	A	162	Claude Code, Codex
re0-mergeLilMGenius/paperthin	Skill	1.4k	4d ago	MIT	A	70	Claude Code