Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add esaterbiltavus/yapay-zeka-turkce-dilekce-skilleri --skill dilekce-klasik-retorikgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/esaterbiltavus/yapay-zeka-turkce-dilekce-skilleriWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/esaterbiltavus/yapay-zeka-turkce-dilekce-skilleri/dilekce-klasik-retorik)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/esaterbiltavus/yapay-zeka-turkce-dilekce-skilleri/dilekce-klasik-retorik"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/esaterbiltavus/yapay-zeka-turkce-dilekce-skilleri/dilekce-klasik-retorik/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/esaterbiltavus/yapay-zeka-turkce-dilekce-skilleri/dilekce-klasik-retorik"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/esaterbiltavus/yapay-zeka-turkce-dilekce-skilleri/dilekce-klasik-retorik.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00217 | $0.01685 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00109 | $0.00843 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00337 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00169 |
Grade A, and why
dilekce-klasik-retorik scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Klasik Retorik Düzeniyle Dilekçe Oluşturma
Klasik Retorik Düzeni (Cicero/Quintilian), modern dava dilekçesinin atasıdır: bugünkü "Açıklamalar → karşı tarafın çürütülmesi → sonuç" akışı doğrudan buradan gelir. Olay anlatımının güçlü, uyuşmazlığın çok başlıklı ve hem kendi iddianı ispatlamayı hem karşı tarafı çürütmeyi gerektirdiği dosyalarda; anlatıyı düzenli ve ikna edici bir iskelete oturtmak için elverişlidir.
Ne zaman kullanılır
- Olay örgüsü zengin; akıcı ve ikna edici bir anlatı kurmak gerekiyor.
- Uyuşmazlık çok başlıklı; iddialar ayrı bölümlere ayrılarak işlenecek.
- Hem kendi iddianı ispatlamak (Confirmatio) hem de karşı tarafı çürütmek (Refutatio) ayrı ayrı ele alınacak.
- Kapsamlı, uzun ve çok bölümlü dava/savunma dilekçeleri — tür fark etmez.
Klasik retorik mantığı
- Exordium — Giriş: Dikkat çeken, ölçülü bir açılış; meseleyi ve duruşunu kısaca tanıt.
- Narratio — Olay Anlatımı: Uyuşmazlığa esas olayı akıcı, kronolojik ve ikna edici biçimde anlat.
- Partitio — Konu Bölümleme: Uyuşmazlığı başlıklara ayır; ele alınacak iddiaları sıraya koy.
- Confirmatio — İspat: Kendi iddianı delil ve hukuki dayanakla ispatla (işin kalbi).
- Refutatio — Çürütme: Karşı tarafın iddialarını tek tek ele alıp çürüt.
- Peroratio — Sonuç: Vurgulu kapanış; özet ve net talep.
Çalışma akışı
- Dilekçe türünü belirle (dava/cevap/replik/düplik/savunma) —
references/bicim-ve-cikti.md. - Bilgileri topla: mahkeme ve dosya no, taraflar, konu, talepler, vakıalar, deliller.
Eksikleri
AskUserQuestionveya kısa sorularla tamamla. Dava dosyası verildiyse oku:.udf→udf-cli udf2md; çok sayfalı.tiff/.tif→ sayfalara böl, tek tek oku; PDF/foto/metin → doğrudan oku. - Klasik retorik iskeletini kur — adım tanımları ve eşleme tablosu için
references/cerceve-yapisi.md. - Gövdeyi yaz: Akışı
Exordium → Narratio → Partitio → Confirmatio → Refutatio → Peroratiosırasıyla kur. Narratio'da olayı akıcı anlat; Partitio ile uyuşmazlığı bölümlere ayır; Confirmatio'da ispatla, Refutatio'da karşı tarafı çürüt; Peroratio'da vurguyla kapat. - Çıktıyı üret (docx/html/udf/pdf) —
references/bicim-ve-cikti.md. - Doğrula ve sun.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 85 lines · 217 tokens per session scan A 10456a5666df
dilekce-klasik-retorik is a skill published in the GitHub repository esaterbiltavus/yapay-zeka-turkce-dilekce-skilleri (12 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 217 tokens to every session and 1,685 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
kr-patent-consistency-check
A Korean patent-document checker for comparing a patent specification, drawings, and claims—the sections that describe an invention and define its legal protection.
kr-patent-spec-drafting
A workflow for writing the main text of a Korean patent specification from draft claims and invention materials, following Korean Patent Office filing structure.
kr-patent-claim1-drafting
A Korean patent-writing procedure for drafting claim 1, the main independent claim in a patent. It turns a paper or invention description into a method claim using a fixed structure and requires approval at key decisions.
kr-patent-dependent-claim-drafting
A Korean patent-writing tool for creating dependent claims, system claims, program claims, and additional independent claims from a paper or invention description and an approved first claim.
kr-patent-full-workflow
A coordinator for writing a Korean patent specification from start to finish. It guides the work through invention interviews, claim preparation, technical details, consistency checks, and final DOCX output.
kr-patent-docx-builder
Nástroj na automatické vytváranie súborov DOCX s textom patentovej prihlášky podľa formulárov Kórejského úradu pre duševné vlastníctvo.