Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/escapeboy/ai-promptsnpx agentmods add skills/escapeboy/ai-prompts/compliance-auditWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/escapeboy/ai-prompts/compliance-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/escapeboy/ai-prompts/compliance-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/escapeboy/ai-prompts/compliance-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/escapeboy/ai-prompts/compliance-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/escapeboy/ai-prompts/compliance-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 64 Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00134 | $0.01792 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00067 | $0.00896 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00358 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 204 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compliance Audit Skill
Note on
references/,scripts/,assets/: this skill demonstrates the progressive-disclosure layout from guide.md — the SKILL.md holds the workflow, while per-regulation checklists, the scan script, and legal templates live in companion files you author for your own jurisdiction set. The workflow below is complete without them; the companion files add depth.
Purpose
Perform comprehensive legal and regulatory compliance audits on software projects. Generate actionable reports, apply automatic code fixes, and produce required legal documentation.
When to Use
- User requests a compliance audit, GDPR check, or privacy review
- User asks to generate Privacy Policy, Cookie Policy, DPA, or DPIA
- User wants to verify data handling practices in code
- Before launching a product or feature that handles personal data
- When preparing for a compliance certification (SOC 2, PCI DSS, HIPAA)
- When adding consent management, cookie banners, or data deletion features
Supported Regulations
| Regulation | Scope | Reference File |
|---|---|---|
| GDPR | EU personal data protection | references/gdpr.md |
| CCPA/CPRA | California consumer privacy | references/ccpa.md |
| ePrivacy | EU cookies, tracking, electronic communications | references/eprivacy.md |
| HIPAA | US health information protection | references/hipaa.md |
| PCI DSS | Payment card data security | references/pci-dss.md |
| SOC 2 | Service organization controls | references/soc2.md |
| WCAG 2.2 | Web accessibility | references/wcag.md |
Audit Workflow
Phase 1: Project Discovery
- Identify project type (web, mobile, API, desktop) and tech stack
- Scan directory structure for relevant files:
- Configuration files (
.env,config/,settings/) - Database schemas/migrations
- Authentication and user management code
- Forms and data collection points
- Third-party integrations and SDKs
- Cookie/tracking implementations
- Logging and monitoring setup
- API endpoints handling personal data
- Configuration files (
- Determine applicable regulations based on:
- Geographic scope (EU users → GDPR, California → CCPA)
- Data types (health data → HIPAA, payment → PCI DSS)
- Service type (B2B SaaS → SOC 2)
- Web presence (any web UI → WCAG)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 204 lines · 134 tokens per session scan A 9fdbf9eb8724
compliance-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository escapeboy/ai-prompts (91 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 134 tokens to every session and 1,792 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…