Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add espennilsen/pi --skill githubgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/espennilsen/piWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/espennilsen/pi/github)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/espennilsen/pi/github"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/espennilsen/pi/github/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/espennilsen/pi/github"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/espennilsen/pi/github.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Prompt Injection · line 45 Subtle instructions detected that may alter agent decision-making or introduce hidden biases.Fix: Review content for implicit steering or bias. Ensure instructions are explicit and align with the skill's stated purpose.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00126 | $0.01096 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00050 | $0.00438 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00219 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
github scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub — pi-github Extension
The pi-github extension provides /gh-* commands for common GitHub
operations. All commands also work as /github-* variants.
Prerequisites
ghCLI installed and authenticated- For repo-scoped commands: run from a git repo, or specify the repo
Commands + Agent Tools
The pi-github extension provides /gh-* commands for user-initiated operations
and LLM tools for agentic workflows (PR review thread resolution).
Commands
| Command | What it does |
|---|---|
/gh-prs [mine|review-requested] [repo] |
List open PRs |
/gh-issues [mine|label:name] [repo] |
List open issues |
/gh-status [repo] |
Repo dashboard: PRs, issues, CI, branch PR |
/gh-actions [branch] [repo] |
Recent workflow runs |
/gh-notifications |
Unread GitHub notifications |
/gh-pr-create [base] |
Create PR with LLM-generated summary |
/gh-pr-review [number|repo#N|URL] |
Show PR review feedback |
/gh-pr-fix [number|repo#N|URL] |
Fix unresolved review threads |
/gh-pr-merge [number|repo#N|URL] [--squash|--merge|--rebase] |
Merge PR + full cleanup |
PR Thread Tools (for agents fixing review feedback)
These tools use gh CLI under the hood — no API tokens needed. Always prefer these over raw REST/GraphQL calls.
| Tool | Purpose |
|---|---|
github_review_thread_reply |
Reply to a PR review thread (thread_id, message) |
github_resolve_review_thread |
Mark a review thread as resolved (thread_id) — MANDATORY after each fix |
github_post_pr_comment |
Post a summary comment on a PR (owner, repo, pr_number, body) |
Repo Reference Syntax
Commands accept flexible repo/PR references anywhere in args:
| Format | Example |
|---|---|
| GitHub URL | https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/123 |
| Owner/repo#N | espennilsen/pi#96 |
| Repo#N (with default owner) | pi#96 |
| Owner/repo | espennilsen/pi |
| Plain number | 96 |
| No args | Auto-detect from current branch |
What ships with it
8 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 113 lines · 126 tokens per session scan A 5dfa9c8f0919
github is a skill published in the GitHub repository espennilsen/pi (122 stars, last pushed 9d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 126 tokens to every session and 1,096 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
merge-batch
Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.
otto-pr-review-loop
Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.
engram-branch-pr
PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.
github-contributor
A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.
revdiff
Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…