open-seo: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/test-audit/SKILL.md

test-audit is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from every-app/open-seo. It costs 80 tokens per session (2,518 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A test-writing and test-review process specifically for Vitest tests, a JavaScript and TypeScript test framework. It covers adding tests, auditing weak or duplicate tests, and reviewing a whole test area when requested.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when adding, changing, reviewing, or cleaning up Vitest tests, while following the repository's own testing rules.
Why use it?
It helps keep tests focused on observable behaviour rather than implementation details and prevents test-only code from remaining without a good reason.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions subagents; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions AGENTS.md.

This is every-app/open-seo's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on open-seo itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything open-seo configures →

About the project

OpenSEO is an open-source SEO platform for keyword research, rank tracking, competitor analysis, backlink analysis, site audits, and AI visibility work. It connects SEO data to AI agents through an MCP server and reusable agent skills, while allowing users to supply their own DataForSEO API key and self-host the tool. Catalogue add-ons guide agents through OpenSEO's SEO workflows.

every-app/open-seo · 23,850 stars · on GitHub · openseo.so

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to every-app/open-seo. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/every-app/open-seo/main/.agents/skills/test-audit/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/every-app/open-seo

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for test-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/every-app/open-seo/test-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/every-app/open-seo/test-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/every-app/open-seo/test-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/every-app/open-seo/test-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for test-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/every-app/open-seo/test-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/every-app/open-seo/test-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 80 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,518 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00080 $0.02518
Opus 5.5 $0.00032 $0.01007
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00504
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00252

Measured 16d ago against content hash 97a44695d48c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

test-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 16d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/test-audit/SKILL.md · 231 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Test Audit

Three modes, one value bar. Authoring mode gates every new or changed test at write time. Audit mode runs focused sweeps for tests that re-assert source, duplicate stronger proof, couple behavior to implementation, or keep test-only production seams alive. Campaign mode reviews every test file with a per-test verdict when the maintainer asks to prune the whole suite; see Campaign mode. Optimize for confidence, not deletion count. Land one coherent batch per PR; continue broad audits as separate follow-ups.

The repository's own rules live in the "Testing" section of AGENTS.md. This skill is the procedure for applying them; when the two disagree, AGENTS.md wins and this file needs an update.

Authoring gate

Before adding a test, answer four questions. A missing answer means do not add it yet:

  1. What observable behavior, invariant, or independent contract does it protect?
  2. What credible regression makes it fail?
  3. Why does existing coverage not already catch that failure? Each contract has one primary owner at the strongest boundary (usually the service or the MCP tool handler, not the repository or a private helper). Another layer needs its own distinct risk. Prefer extending a table-driven case or a shared factory (ga4-test-fixtures.ts, tool-test-support.ts) over a near-duplicate test, and consolidate duplicated setup in the same change.
  4. Does it need a production seam (export, flag, wrapper, injection hook) that no production caller needs? If yes, test at the real boundary instead. Grep the whole repo for callers, not just src/; scripts/ counts.

Then check the test against every junk pattern; a match fails the gate unless the retention bar names the contract it independently guards. A test that would break under behavior-preserving refactoring is asserting implementation, not behavior; rewrite it at the owning boundary before landing it.

Bug regression tests must fail on the pre-fix code for the intended reason and pass after the fix. A regression test that never demonstrably failed proves the mock, not the fix. One regression at the owner boundary covers the bug; do not replay it at every layer it crosses.

Read the full file on GitHub · 231 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 16d ago First seen · 231 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 97a44695d48c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

test-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository every-app/open-seo (23,850 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 2,518 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-01.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

altorank

Run AltoRank through its hosted MCP server: readiness audits, Search Console, keyword research, and SEO drafts into a review queue.

sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills · 30 tokens

qa-testing

Run QA testing on a page, feature, or full site at one of three depth tiers (smoke, standard, full). Use this skill whenever the user asks to QA a page or site, run a smoke test after a deploy, verify a page before launch, or run a regression sweep. Triggers on QA, QA sweep, smoke test, regression test, post-deploy…

rampstackco/claude-skills · 170 tokens

setup-svelte-vitals

Set up svelte-vitals in a SvelteKit project: inspect what the project already uses, derive a svelte-vitals.config from its markuplint / eslint-plugin-check-file config and its actual directory conventions, measure each candidate rule before adopting it, and hand the remaining targets to svelte-vitals install. Use when…

oekazuma/svelte-vitals · 109 tokens

wordstat-collector

A tool that collects search statistics from Yandex Wordstat, the Yandex service for researching what people search for. It returns search phrases and their frequencies for Russian-language market research.

axelfreeman/yandex-wordstat-guide · 84 tokens

playground

Launches a local WordPress Playground site with The SEO Framework mounted, captures front-end SEO artifacts, and compares before/after plugin states. Use when testing regressions, reproducing bugs, changing meta/sitemap/robots/ schema/oEmbed/admin SEO output, checking WordPress version behavior, plugin conflicts, or…

sybrew/the-seo-framework · 73 tokens

improve-svelte

Survey a whole SvelteKit codebase as a senior Svelte/SvelteKit engineer, using svelte-vitals' scan as evidence, then produce a prioritized audit and self-contained implementation plans for other agents (or cheaper models) to execute. Read-only on source code — it plans improvements, it does not apply them. Use when…

oekazuma/svelte-vitals · 136 tokens