Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/system-design-patternsnpx skills add Everyone-Needs-A-Copilot/claude-copilot --skill system-design-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Everyone-Needs-A-Copilot/claude-copilotWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/system-design-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/system-design-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/everyone-needs-a-copilot/claude-copilot/system-design-patterns.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00094 | $0.02511 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00047 | $0.01256 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00502 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00251 |
Grade A, and why
system-design-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 276 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
System Design Patterns
Architecture patterns, ADR methodology, and trade-off analysis frameworks for making and documenting sound design decisions.
ADR completeness is deterministic — the script checks required field presence and scores coverage. Pattern selection and trade-off quality are prose judgment, left to the model.
Purpose
- Document architectural decisions with full context and rationale
- Select the right architectural pattern for the problem at hand
- Validate architecture with automated fitness functions
- Analyse trade-offs explicitly before committing to a direction
ADR Template
Architecture Decision Records capture the context and consequences of significant design choices.
# ADR-[number]: [Title]
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Status:** Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded by ADR-[n]
## Context
What is the situation forcing a decision? What constraints exist?
What forces are at play (technical, political, organizational)?
## Decision
What was decided? State it as an active voice sentence:
"We will use [X] because [Y]."
## Consequences
**Positive:**
- [Benefit 1]
- [Benefit 2]
**Negative:**
- [Trade-off 1]
- [Trade-off 2]
**Neutral:**
- [Side effect that is neither good nor bad]
## Alternatives Rejected
| Alternative | Reason Rejected |
|-------------|----------------|
| [Option A] | [Why not chosen] |
| [Option B] | [Why not chosen] |
## References
- [Link to relevant documentation, RFC, or prior art]
Architecture Pattern Decision Matrix
| Pattern | Best When | Avoid When | Key Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Layered (Monolith) | Small team, simple domain, fast iteration needed | Independent deployment required, team > 10, polyglot stack | Fast to build; harder to scale independently |
| Microservices | Independent deployment needed, team autonomy, polyglot stack | Domain is unclear, team is small, ops maturity is low | High autonomy; high operational complexity |
| Event-Driven | Async workflows, eventual consistency acceptable, audit trail needed | Strong consistency required, debugging must be simple | Decoupled producers; complex event ordering |
| CQRS | Read/write asymmetry, complex queries, event sourcing in use | Simple CRUD, small team, low query complexity | Optimised reads/writes; two models to maintain |
| API Gateway | Multiple clients, rate limiting needed, auth aggregation | Single client, low traffic, gateway becomes bottleneck | Centralised cross-cutting concerns; single point of failure risk |
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 276 lines · 94 tokens per session scan A b34da95bb8b7
system-design-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository Everyone-Needs-A-Copilot/claude-copilot (13 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 94 tokens to every session and 2,511 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
architecture-design
Use this skill to design system architecture with documented trade-offs and decisions before any implementation begins. Activates when a feature, system, or component requires non-trivial structural decisions about how components interact, what data stores to use, or how to decompose a problem.
architecture-paradigms
Selects and routes to the right architecture paradigm. Use when choosing patterns for a new system or comparing trade-offs before making architecture decisions.
design-expert
Expert-level system design, architecture patterns, scalability, and distributed systems. Use when the user mentions system design, architecture, scalability, distributed systems, or patterns, or when the task involves Architecture Patterns or Design Principles.
software-patterns
Compare tradeoffs and recommend architectural patterns — dependency injection, service-oriented architecture, repository, domain events, circuit breaker, and anti-corruption layer. Use when choosing between design patterns, planning microservices boundaries, evaluating system design alternatives, or asking 'which…
adr-documentation
Architecture Decision Records (ADR) documentation practice. Use when documenting architectural decisions, recording technical trade-offs, creating decision logs, or establishing architectural patterns. Trigger keywords - "ADR", "architecture decision", "decision record", "trade-offs", "architectural decision"…
scope-appropriate-architecture
Right-sizes architecture to project scope, classifying projects into 6 tiers to prevent over-engineering. Use when designing architecture, selecting patterns, or detecting a project tier.