Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add EvoClaw/amplify --skill paper-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/EvoClaw/amplifyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoclaw/amplify/paper-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoclaw/amplify/paper-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evoclaw/amplify/paper-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/evoclaw/amplify/paper-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/evoclaw/amplify/paper-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.11847 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.04739 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.02369 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.01185 |
Grade A, and why
paper-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,097 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Paper Writing (Phase 6)
Overview
A paper is not a results dump — it is an argument. This skill enforces structured, senior-level academic writing with verified references, modular LaTeX, and adversarial self-review. Every section is drafted, reviewed, and revised before the paper is assembled.
On-Demand Literature Search (Active Throughout Phase 6)
During paper writing — especially Related Work, Introduction, and Discussion — you will need additional references. Search immediately when needed. Do not write "studies have shown..." without a real citation. Add new papers to docs/02_literature/paper-list.md with tag [Found during Phase 6].
If search fails or returns insufficient results:
- Try alternative search terms (synonyms, broader/narrower scope, different field terminology)
- If still insufficient → note what was searched and what's missing in
docs/02_literature/paper-list.md - Ask the user: "I need a citation for [claim] but couldn't find a suitable reference. Can you suggest one?"
- Do NOT fabricate citations — use
\textcolor{red}{[CITATION NEEDED]}as a placeholder and flag it in the writing review
Step 1 — Confirm Venue and Template
"Your confirmed target is [venue]. Is this still correct?"
After confirmation:
- Obtain the official LaTeX template for the venue
- Confirm page limit, format requirements, reference style (e.g., numbered vs. author-year)
- Record in
research-anchor.yamlfieldvenue_confirmed_phase6
Do not proceed until venue is locked.
Step 1b — Generate Dynamic Expert Persona
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 1,097 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A d6b3fbd995c1
paper-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository EvoClaw/amplify (11 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 11,847 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
paper-writing compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| paper-writingEvoClaw/amplify | Skill | 11 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code, Codex |
| 5writingjihe520/MathModelAgent | Skill | 6.3k | 4d ago | none | A | 68 | Claude Code |
| 6verityjihe520/MathModelAgent | Skill | 6.3k | 4d ago | none | A | 76 | Claude Code |
| 1start-mathmodeljihe520/MathModelAgent | Skill | 6.3k | 4d ago | none | A | 64 | Claude Code |
| 4drawiojihe520/MathModelAgent | Skill | 6.3k | 4d ago | none | A | 65 | Claude Code |
| mathmodel-to-eijihe520/MathModelAgent | Skill | 6.3k | 4d ago | none | A | 92 | Codex |
| 2analysis-modelingjihe520/MathModelAgent | Skill | 6.3k | 4d ago | none | A | 67 | Claude Code |