Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/existential-birds/beagle/commit-pushnpx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill commit-pushgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/existential-birds/beagleWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00013 | $0.01031 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00515 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00206 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
commit-push scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 131 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Commit and Push
Commit all local changes following Conventional Commits format and push to remote.
Gates
Complete in order. Do not run the next action until the Pass condition is satisfied (use command output as evidence, not memory).
- Diff understood — Pass when: Outputs from
git status,git diff, andgit diff --cachedare consistent with your one-sentence description of what changed (or you recorded that there is nothing to commit). - Commit line chosen — Pass when: You have a draft first line
type(scope): description(ortype: descriptionif omitting scope) that matches the change set you intend to ship. - Staging matches intent — Pass when: After
git add,git diff --cached --stat(and spot-checkgit diff --cachedif needed) shows only the paths you meant to include; adjust staging before committing if not. - Push target confirmed — Pass when: Current branch and remote are the ones you intend (
git branch -vv,git remote -v); then push. - Remote caught up — Pass when:
git statusis clean andgit status -sbshows the branch is up to date with its configured upstream (no unexpected unpushed commits left for this task).
Step 1: Gather Context
Run these commands in parallel to understand the changes:
# See all untracked and modified files
git status
# See staged and unstaged changes
git diff
git diff --cached
# See recent commit messages for style reference
git log --oneline -10
Step 2: Analyze Changes
Review the changes and determine:
-
Type: What kind of change is this?
feat- New feature or capabilityfix- Bug fixdocs- Documentation onlyrefactor- Code restructure without behavior changetest- Adding or updating testschore- Maintenance, dependency updatesperf- Performance improvementci- CI/CD changes
-
Scope: Which component is affected?
- Examine the changed files and determine the appropriate scope
- Use consistent scope names within the project (check
git logfor patterns) - (omit scope for cross-cutting changes)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 131 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A ec6c8a20e102
commit-push is a skill published in the GitHub repository existential-birds/beagle (79 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 1,031 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
portr-cli
Use when an AI agent or harness needs to operate the Portr CLI: authenticate a client, add users to teams, create HTTP/WebSocket/TCP/stub tunnels, run config-defined tunnels, inspect request logs, replay captured requests, or control tunnels through the local app-server API. This skill is compatible with Claude Code…
compliance-scan
Scans a Python AI project for EU AI Act compliance gaps using AIR Blackbox. Use when the user asks to check compliance, scan their code, audit their AI project, or mentions EU AI Act, Articles 9-15, or compliance checking.
add-tool
Add a new MCP tool to this WhatsApp server. Use when asked to expose a new capability, wrap a new bridge endpoint, or add a tool to tools.py or scheduling.py. Covers annotations, the confirm guard, core-set placement, retrieval aliases, and the eval case.
verify-wire-claim
Verify a claim about WhatsApp behaviour before writing it down. Use whenever about to state that a feature works, a flag is enforced, a message was view-once, a poll cap applies, or any assertion about what WhatsApp does. Also use when documenting a finding in docs/protocol-vs-app.md.
deploy
Build, deploy, verify, or roll back this server on the host. Use when asked to ship a change, rebuild a container, update nginx, or diagnose why the service is down. Covers the memory-capped build, the reload-not-restart rule, and the unhealthy-container failure mode.
xiaohongshu-content-workflow
将书籍、文章或主题素材整理为小红书 3:4 图卡、文案和只读合规复核结果;默认只生成,不发布。.