Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill review-feedback-schemagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/existential-birds/beagleWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/review-feedback-schema)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/existential-birds/beagle/review-feedback-schema"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/existential-birds/beagle/review-feedback-schema.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.02356 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01178 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00471 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00236 |
Grade A, and why
review-feedback-schema scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 199 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Feedback Schema
Purpose
Structured format for logging code review outcomes. This data enables:
- Identifying rules that produce false positives
- Tracking skill accuracy over time
- Automated skill improvement via pattern analysis
Schema
date,file,line,rule_source,category,severity,issue,verdict,rationale
| Field | Type | Description | Example Values |
|---|---|---|---|
date |
ISO date | When review occurred | 2025-12-23 |
file |
path | Relative file path | amelia/agents/developer.py |
line |
string | Line number(s) | 128, 190-191 |
rule_source |
string | Skill and rule that triggered issue | python-code-review/common-mistakes:unused-variables, pydantic-ai-common-pitfalls:tool-decorator |
category |
enum | Issue taxonomy | type-safety, async, error-handling, style, patterns, testing, security |
severity |
enum | As flagged by reviewer | critical, major, minor |
issue |
string | Brief description | Return type list[Any] loses type safety |
verdict |
enum | Human decision | ACCEPT, REJECT, DEFER, ACKNOWLEDGE |
rationale |
string | Why verdict was chosen | pydantic-ai docs explicitly support this pattern |
Gates (feedback log rows)
Run in order before appending a row. Do not skip ahead while a gate fails.
-
Evidence bound to code
- Pass when:
fileis a repo-relative path that exists (or existed at review time), andlineidentifies line number(s) you actually opened—not only a paraphrased summary.
- Pass when:
-
Rule source attributable
- Pass when:
rule_sourcematchesskill-name[/section]:rule-id(see Rule Source Format). If the trigger is unknown, set a best-effort source and state the gap inrationaleinstead of inventing a rule id.
- Pass when:
-
Verdict backed by artifact
- Pass when: For
REJECT,rationalecites something checkable (command + output, doc URL, or quoted code). ForACCEPT, it states the fix or points to the change. ForDEFER/ACKNOWLEDGE, it names a tracker, timeline, or documented intent per Verdict Types.
- Pass when: For
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 199 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 8a1118246212
review-feedback-schema is a skill published in the GitHub repository existential-birds/beagle (80 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 2,356 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
rework-rate
Measure and interpret PR rework rate — the emerging 5th DORA metric.
go-testing
Trigger: Go tests, go test coverage, Bubbletea teatest, golden files. Apply focused Go testing patterns.
security-review
Perform a focused security review of pending git changes to identify high-confidence security vulnerabilities with real exploitation potential. Use this skill when the user asks for a security review, security audit, vulnerability scan, or wants to check pending changes on a branch for security issues before merging.…
huggingface-llm-trainer
Train or fine-tune language models with TRL or Unsloth on Hugging Face Jobs, including SFT, DPO, GRPO, reward models, and GGUF conversion. Use for cloud LLM training; use huggingface-vision-trainer for vision tasks.
reply-to-pr-threads
Draft, confirm, and post replies to GitHub PR review threads. Handles per-category reply formatting, re-fetches thread resolution state so auto-resolved threads are skipped, and posts via GraphQL. Use when the user asks to "reply to PR threads", "post PR thread replies", or "draft PR reply messages".
review
Validate plans, execution, or PRs against wish criteria — returns SHIP / FIX-FIRST / BLOCKED with severity-tagged gaps.